Re: [tor-dev] Brainstorming Domain Fronted Bridge Distribution (was meek costs)

2015-05-05 Thread Mike Perry
isis: > Mike Perry transcribed 5.1K bytes: > > […] > > > > 2. Perhaps cleaner: if BridgeDB itself were accessible through a domain > > front, we could export its captcha and bridge distribution through an > > API on this domain front. Once your IP forwarding in > > https://trac.torproject.org/proje

Re: [tor-dev] Summary of meek's costs, April 2015

2015-05-05 Thread isis
Mike Perry transcribed 5.1K bytes: > […] > > 2. Perhaps cleaner: if BridgeDB itself were accessible through a domain > front, we could export its captcha and bridge distribution through an > API on this domain front. Once your IP forwarding in > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13171

Re: [tor-dev] Summary of meek's costs, April 2015

2015-05-05 Thread Griffin Boyce
Mike Perry wrote: David Fifield: Here's the summary of meek's CDN fees for April 2015. total by CDN $3292.25 + $3792.79 + $0.00 = $7085.04 grand total https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-bridge-transport.html?graph=userstats-bridge-transport&start=2015-02-01&end=2015-04-30&transport=meek

Re: [tor-dev] Summary of meek's costs, April 2015

2015-05-05 Thread grarpamp
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Mike Perry wrote: > Yikes! > > Given your costs, it also seems worthwhile for us to fund development to > improve this situation, so that meek remains a transport of last resort > rather than people's first choice. > > Here's a couple options: > > 1. We can add a br

Re: [tor-dev] Summary of meek's costs, April 2015

2015-05-05 Thread Mike Perry
David Fifield: > Here's the summary of meek's CDN fees for April 2015. > > total by CDN $3292.25 + $3792.79 + $0.00 = $7085.04 grand total > https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-bridge-transport.html?graph=userstats-bridge-transport&start=2015-02-01&end=2015-04-30&transport=meek Yikes! Are t

Re: [tor-dev] Tor + Apache Traffic Server w/ SOCKS - works now!

2015-05-05 Thread Tom Ritter
On 5 May 2015 at 15:30, CJ Ess wrote: > I think we have differing goals, however your or-ctl-filter is very cool and > I think I will need to add it to my stack. Could expand a bit about what function you use ATS for and what the benefits you get out of it are? I'm familiar with ATS, but I'm jus

Re: [tor-dev] Tor + Apache Traffic Server w/ SOCKS - works now!

2015-05-05 Thread CJ Ess
I think we have differing goals, however your or-ctl-filter is very cool and I think I will need to add it to my stack. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:20 PM, David Stainton wrote: > i don't see any benefit from running yet another c program on my > computer... why not run something like Yawning's or

Re: [tor-dev] Tor + Apache Traffic Server w/ SOCKS - works now!

2015-05-05 Thread David Stainton
i don't see any benefit from running yet another c program on my computer... why not run something like Yawning's or-ctl-filter between your tor and tbb? at least it's written in a safer language and does useful things like filter OR commands: https://github.com/Yawning/or-ctl-filter anyone who k

[tor-dev] Tor + Apache Traffic Server w/ SOCKS - works now!

2015-05-05 Thread CJ Ess
So I've been looking for a long time for something modern to sit between my browser and Tor -- something modern, capable, and efficient (i.e. doesn't fork every connection). Years ago Yahoo got some proxy software from an acquisition, a few years later they made it open source as Apache Traffic Se

Re: [tor-dev] working back to socks_request_t

2015-05-05 Thread teor
> Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 16:07:20 -0400 > From: CJ Ess > > Thanks for going into so much detail, you've given me a lot to think about. > The real solution is probably the one that nobody wants to take on - having > an application HTTP port that could take direct input from HTTP aware stuff > and