Re: [tor-dev] Draft of proposal "Direct Onion Services: Fast-but-not-hidden services"

FYI, I have been collecting the proposed names at . I also just added two suggestions that haven’t been on this thread: “flagrant onion service” and “open onion service”. Thanks for Alec Muffett for the former. Apo

Re: [tor-dev] Experimenting with private tor setup

> On 23 Apr 2015, at 01:05 , teor wrote: > > >> On 22 Apr 2015, at 23:24 , teor wrote: >> … >> >> It appears that my original fix to bug #13924 didn't anticipate anyone using >> "ExtendAllowPrivateAddresses 1" without "TestingTorNetwork 1". I'll submit a >> patch which swaps TestingTorNetwo

Re: [tor-dev] tor-dev Digest, Vol 51, Issue 34

; in your consensus. This probably isn't necessary for your purposes, as your > instances are all on the same host. > > It's also not something that chutney does, and chutney networks function > fine. > > teor > > teor2345 at gmail dot com > pgp 0xABFED1AC > ht

Re: [tor-dev] Experimenting with private tor setup

> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:14:07 -0400 > From: CJ Ess … > I think that just leaves a couple questions for now: > > - I know the directory authority's certificate needs to be > renewed periodically (looks like 12 months default). Since it asked for a > password that is something I need to do manu