[tor-dev] TOR SoP proposal: extending and improving TOR network anomaly detection

2015-04-13 Thread Kibo Schaffer
Hi all, I'm applying for TOR Summer of Privacy. I'm curious if there are any developers here who are able and willing to become a mentor for this idea. I want to improve TOR's ability to detect anomalies such as sybil attacks, and make it easy to include other heuristics for other potential attac

Re: [tor-dev] Draft of proposal "Direct Onion Services: Fast-but-not-hidden services"

2015-04-13 Thread A. Johnson
> I've been hesitant to weigh in on the naming conversation for hidden > services. But I am concerned about the issues raised in the previous few > emails on the topic. > > Matt @ Speak Freely has a strong point about acronym collisions - they only > serve to confuse users and dilute the search

Re: [tor-dev] Fwd: Orbot v15 RC3... now with x86/ATOM-power!

2015-04-13 Thread Daniel Martí
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 14:30:04 -0400, Nathan Freitas wrote: > We were previously using linux/arm for the PT compiling, and it mostly > worked, but it turns out there are enough small differences in the > Android API from Linux, that it does matter to target Android > specifically. This is similar

Re: [tor-dev] Fwd: Orbot v15 RC3... now with x86/ATOM-power!

2015-04-13 Thread Nathan Freitas
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Daniel Martí wrote: > Possibly stupid question, but wouldn't a static linux/x86 binary work > just fine as long as you're executing it directly? As far as I know the > Android port is just for all the bindings involved in e.g. writing a > game in Go that does Open

Re: [tor-dev] Fwd: Orbot v15 RC3... now with x86/ATOM-power!

2015-04-13 Thread Daniel Martí
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 13:09:30 -0400, Nathan Freitas wrote: > > > One interesting issue is that GoLang 1.4.1, which we are using to > > > cross-compile the Meek and Obfs4 pluggable transports to Android, only > > > supports targeting Android ARM for right now... I assume that will > > > change so

Re: [tor-dev] Fwd: Orbot v15 RC3... now with x86/ATOM-power!

2015-04-13 Thread Nathan Freitas
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015, at 12:57 PM, Yawning Angel wrote: > On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:14:43 -0400 > Nathan Freitas wrote: > > One interesting issue is that GoLang 1.4.1, which we are using to > > cross-compile the Meek and Obfs4 pluggable transports to Android, only > > supports targeting Android ARM f

Re: [tor-dev] Fwd: Orbot v15 RC3... now with x86/ATOM-power!

2015-04-13 Thread Yawning Angel
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:14:43 -0400 Nathan Freitas wrote: > One interesting issue is that GoLang 1.4.1, which we are using to > cross-compile the Meek and Obfs4 pluggable transports to Android, only > supports targeting Android ARM for right now... I assume that will > change soon, but if not, we m

[tor-dev] Fwd: Orbot v15 RC3... now with x86/ATOM-power!

2015-04-13 Thread Nathan Freitas
- Original message - From: Nathan of Guardian To: guardian-...@lists.mayfirst.org Subject: Orbot v15 RC3... now with x86/ATOM-power! Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:55:44 -0400 Making some tiny changes to external/Makefile and jni/Application.mk means we can now build the tor, polipo and xtable

[tor-dev] project related

2015-04-13 Thread raj kumar
hi , i am a second year BSc.cs undergraduate student and i am very much interested in doing a project on tor's ''profile UDP transport protocol''. But since i am new to this project thing, i am really in need of ideas and suggestions to accomplish this. It would be great if u can help me with this

Re: [tor-dev] onionoo: historic details.json data

2015-04-13 Thread Karsten Loesing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/04/15 17:39, Nusenu wrote: >> On 05/04/15 23:35, Nusenu wrote: can one download historic onionoo documents (details.json) archived somewhere or would one have to setup onionoo + feed old data into it to achieve that? >> There are