>> Would you still set a max lifetime for a circuit to accept new streams of 2
>> hours, or would the circuit potentially persist forever?
>
> Nick set a max lifetime in his updated version of the patch that also
> deals with non-Tor Browser activity, but I am not convinced that a max
> is a grea
> Did some searching this morning and found another I like almost just
> as well, and might be more fitting: Erebus.
Actually, I'm warming up to Nyx too, which has the advantage of being
shorter. Surprisingly it too doesn't have much in terms of conflicts
(mostly just cosmetics and gaming).
Both
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Isabela wrote:
> Hello there!
> we are almost done with the triage of 0.2.7 - we have a good chunk of
> tickets organized into 2 groups at the spreadsheet.
>
> Now what I would like to ask people from today till our next IRC meeting
> (Core Tor meeting on Wednesda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Karsten,
the latest onionoo update 2.3 triggered a bug in my onionoo "client"
(charset encoding). Even though it is a bug on my side, would you mind
announcing future releases/deployments on onionoo-announce [1]
including a short changelog?
than
A. Johnson:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Would you still set a max lifetime for a circuit to accept new streams of 2
> hours, or would the circuit potentially persist forever?
Nick set a max lifetime in his updated version of the patch that also
deals with non-Tor Browser activity, but I am not convinced that
Indeed, it would be better if this customization will only apply to
circuits requested by Tor Browser (web pages, etc.). Many people just
keep Tor Browser running in order to open the Tor socks5 port on
localhost, and use that socks proxy with other applications/protocols.
Are there any clear bene
Hey all,
I was wondering if anyone could help me figure out the status of this blog
post (from August 2014):
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/call-arms-helping-internet-services-accept-anonymous-users
Specifically this part: "Step one is to enumerate the set of websites and
other Internet service
Thanks syndikal. I can't say I'm overly concerned about the shadow
connotation. In fact, as an anonymity tool I think it's delightfully
fitting. There's nothing inherently negative about shadows or secrecy.
Privacy is indeed what we're all about, after all.
Cheers! -Damian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:51:56 -0700
Damian Johnson wrote:
> In greek mythology Erebus is a primordial deity and personification of
> shadow [1].
i may not be very qualified to name projects (and this is my first
contribution to arm), but i feel tha
> Gave it some more thought over the last couple days and think I'll
> move forward with it.
Hi all. I apologize for making more noise on this front but I couldn't
shake the feeling that I'm making a mistake. While I like the name
'seth' Mike was right, most people I ran it by associate it with a
Hello there!
we are almost done with the triage of 0.2.7 - we have a good chunk of
tickets organized into 2 groups at the spreadsheet.
Now what I would like to ask people from today till our next IRC meeting
(Core Tor meeting on Wednesday) is shape group 1 to be our final list.
What that means? Re
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
> Mike Perry:
>> In Tor Browser 4.5a5, we decided to increase MaxCircuitDirtiness to 2
>> hours (https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13766).
>>
>> Because we also use Tor's SOCKS username isolation using the URL bar
>> domain as the SO
Hi Mike,
Would you still set a max lifetime for a circuit to accept new streams of 2
hours, or would the circuit potentially persist forever?
Security losses that such a change would result in (some of which you mention)
include:
1. Making it easier for an exit to profile the user because it
13 matches
Mail list logo
