> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:32:50 -0400
> From: Nick Mathewson
>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Nusenu wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I like prop242 [1] because it doesn't "Nuke MyFamily" [2] but replaces
>> it with a better approach. "Better"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Nusenu:
>> Okay, just in case you change your mind, let's talk more about
>> integrating this into Onionoo. There's already the `family`
>> parameter which I specifically added for Virgil's thing.
>
> Yes I'm using the 'family' list as well now -
So, what do we think? I'd say that MyFamily is likely to continue to
MyFamily is also critical for people who are running a lot of relays.
It's ideal to list keys, but in a scenario where I run two dozen relays
or more, having a good shorthand for them would make it easier to group
them.
Hello all,
Just a quick heads up for where this is going:
* 'GET_ONIONS' was changed to be 'GETINFO' subcommands for consistency.
* Code is in 'needs_review', for the 2nd round.
As a proof of concept I wrote: https://github.com/Yawning/onionwrap
It's a dumb quick and dirty hack that works like
> So, what do we think? I'd say that MyFamily is likely to continue to
"Virgil's gamification site" needs a MyFamily, ergo I am in favor of
keeping MyFamily, whether it be in the current, prop242, or
alternative form. Obviously the prop242 form is a much better
rendition of MyFamily, but unless
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/03/15 16:33, Nusenu wrote:
>
>
> Karsten Loesing:
>> maybe give it a new name
>
> Is 'aggregator' ok, or should there be no 'tor' in the word at
> all?
I think "onion" is the new "tor" to build names around. Though I
don't think "aggregator"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Karsten Loesing:
> maybe give it a new name
Is 'aggregator' ok, or should there be no 'tor' in the word at all?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVEDJZAAoJEFv7XvVCELh0kJAQAIGzub91WhiAmE5qpRe2Y6l3
dYIu9/XvSjF/CchcxKx64nR5/6iSggSb+1anWgW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Karsten Loesing:
> Okay, just in case you change your mind, let's talk more about
> integrating this into Onionoo. There's already the `family`
> parameter which I specifically added for Virgil's thing.
Yes I'm using the 'family' list as well now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/03/15 14:55, Nusenu wrote:
> Hi Karsten,
>
> thanks for your reply.
>
>>> -T --by-contact (#6675) (Maybe we should truncate contacts and
>>> remove the undefined)
>
>> I didn't look at the ticket or code, but truncating contacts
>> sounds li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/03/15 15:26, Nusenu wrote:
> Nusenu:
>> I figured it might make sense to discuss this in a separate
>> thread.
>
>>> And just in case you were wondering, if you ever have a feature
>>> request for Onionoo, I'd be happy to discuss that. In
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Nusenu:
> I figured it might make sense to discuss this in a separate
> thread.
>
>> And just in case you were wondering, if you ever have a feature
>> request for Onionoo, I'd be happy to discuss that. In contrast
>> to some of its clients, Onion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
another good reason to move it to the backend:
Virgil (also using MyFamily data to group relays) and any other
application using onionoo can also take advantage of that (no need to
re-implement it n times).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIcBAEBCgAG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I figured it might make sense to discuss this in a separate thread.
> And just in case you were wondering, if you ever have a feature
> request for Onionoo, I'd be happy to discuss that. In contrast to
> some of its clients, Onionoo itself is act
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Karsten,
thanks for your reply.
>> -T --by-contact (#6675) (Maybe we should truncate contacts and
>> remove the undefined)
>
> I didn't look at the ticket or code, but truncating contacts
> sounds like it could confuse users more than help the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Nusenu wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi,
>
> I like prop242 [1] because it doesn't "Nuke MyFamily" [2] but replaces
> it with a better approach. "Better" in terms of scalability and
> maintainability.
>
> I don't know of any current
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I like prop242 [1] because it doesn't "Nuke MyFamily" [2] but replaces
it with a better approach. "Better" in terms of scalability and
maintainability.
I don't know of any current 'tools' (except the tor client itself)
that use MyFamily data bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/03/15 15:12, Nusenu wrote:
> Hi Karsten,
Hi Nusenu,
> I added a few new grouping options to compass:
>
> -T --by-contact (#6675) (Maybe we should truncate contacts and
> remove the undefined)
I didn't look at the ticket or code, but truncatin
17 matches
Mail list logo
