I am really looking forward to reading this over the weeked!
Thanks!
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> As I mentioned at the dev meeting, Mashael and I were just finishing up
> a survey paper on Tor performance and security research.
>
> The tech report version was just pos
Mike Perry writes:
> Conversational confusion aside, one of my pet peeves is being unable to
> search the web for a piece of software by name only and find it on the
> first page.
+1
Also I think to be *completely* modern, you have to make sure the .io
domain still exists too, right? ;) FWIW, "
Prateek Mittal:
> Mashael, Ian -- this looks awesome, congrats!
>
> A couple of very minor comments come to mind (mainly from looking at Figure
> 5):
> a) For AS-level adversaries, the following could be useful inclusions:
> http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1029199
> http://moria.freehaven.net/an
Mashael, Ian -- this looks awesome, congrats!
A couple of very minor comments come to mind (mainly from looking at Figure
5):
a) For AS-level adversaries, the following could be useful inclusions:
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1029199
http://moria.freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/murdoch-pet2007.pd
Thanks to both of you! Mashael deserves the bulk of the kudos, of
course. ;-)
- Ian
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 05:54:39PM +, David Stainton wrote:
> Dear Ian,
>
> Thanks for publishing this! I am now a huge fan of your work... This
> is excellent!
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
>
>
> On Fri,
Dear Ian,
Thanks for publishing this! I am now a huge fan of your work... This
is excellent!
Cheers,
David
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Paul Syverson
wrote:
> Only glanced through it, but it looks amazingly comprehensive for a 32
> page paper (plus references). I haven't read it yet, but
Only glanced through it, but it looks amazingly comprehensive for a 32
page paper (plus references). I haven't read it yet, but a glance
suggests it could be a go-to reference to give to people wanting to
get up to speed on Tor and its current research questions. Congrats!
aloha,
Paul
On Fri, Mar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/15 21:26, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 06:01:13PM +, George Kadianakis wrote:
>> Karsten Loesing writes:
>>> The question is, what graphs do we want on Metrics? How
>>> about:
>>>
>>> - Total hidden-service traffic
This is a great discussion, thanks Mike for writing down TBB release
process.
I think is very important to start being more strategical on how we plan
the different projects releases. Of course this doesn't mean we have to
force a big change right away, that is why the discussion is important
so w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/15 19:01, George Kadianakis wrote:
> Karsten Loesing writes:
>> Also note that more is not necessarily better. All graphs we put
>> on Metrics should be easy to comprehend for non-researchers and
>> non-developers. If there's a graph that
> Hi everyone,
>
> "Argos: the name of the 100-eyed giant in Greek mythology."
>
> It fits, if my opinion were to be welcome.
> And it doesn't clash with the "Argus" programming language.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argus_Panoptes
Hi Lluís. Last night I sunk a couple hours into looking for
a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/15 17:08, A. Johnson wrote:
>> Looking forward, hidden-service statistics are now available on
>> Metrics:
>>
>> https://metrics.torproject.org/hidserv-data.html
>
> Looks great!
>
>> - Total hidden-service traffic in Mbit/s (per day, using
Hi everyone,
"Argos: the name of the 100-eyed giant in Greek mythology."
It fits, if my opinion were to be welcome.
And it doesn't clash with the "Argus" programming language.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argus_Panoptes
Lluís
Andreas Krey:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:36 +, Damian Johnson
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
>
> As fair warning, I am very likely to decide that it will be better to
> ship 0.2.7.x in TBB 5.0-stable on Aug 11th, as I suspect that the risk
> from things like PT compatibility and control port compatibility issues
> will actually make a r
As I mentioned at the dev meeting, Mashael and I were just finishing up
a survey paper on Tor performance and security research.
The tech report version was just posted on eprint:
https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/235
for your perusing pleasure. ;-)
Thanks,
- Ian
___
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:36 +, Damian Johnson wrote:
...
> And on a side note, damn naming things is hard...
Indeed. You mostly need invented names to avoid the google trap,
like git didn't, and thalys did.
'sethor' came to mind, and it contains 'tor' in a non-roger-invoking
way. :-) (But ap
>> Not to be a downer, but I'm not sure a common name like Seth really
>> solves the problem here. I can already foresee:
>>
>> new_person: New relay operator here, any tips?
>> somebody: Hey, try Seth!
>> new_person: The EFF technologist who posts on tor-talk?
>> new_person: Does he help with
17 matches
Mail list logo
