Re: [tor-dev] Two TOR questions

2015-03-10 Thread iratemonkey
I only have time to reply back to your reply on part 3 tonight, but it is not a 'bug', this seems to be done on purpose. > 3) Why is the little orion icon missing in TOR 4.0.4 bundle for Windows? Now > Tor bundle looks exactly the same as regular Firefox and Firefox GUI looks > like Chrome.

Re: [tor-dev] Two TOR questions

2015-03-10 Thread Tom Ritter
On 10 March 2015 at 11:22, John Lee wrote: > For devs, > > 1) Where can I get a previous version of Tor Bundle for Windows? I'm looking > for the version when it jumped from Firefox 24 ESR (or something below > Firefox 28.0) to the new Firefox GUI that occurred when going above version > 28.0 htt

Re: [tor-dev] RFC: Ephemeral Hidden Services via the Control Port

2015-03-10 Thread Yawning Angel
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:14:47 + Yawning Angel wrote: > Anyway now that master is 0.2.7.x, I'm looking to revisit this in the > form of: [snip] I talked to a few people at Valencia about this, including discussing the outstanding issues and made the following changes since the last discussion:

Re: [tor-dev] Two protocols to measure relay-sensitive hidden-service statistics

2015-03-10 Thread A. Johnson
Well, friends, here’s an attack on the whole anonymization approach to reporting HSDir (or other) statistics: 1. The adversary creates a large number of onion services that almost always cover the entire set of HSDirs. 2. The adversary performs actions with his onion services that add to the

Re: [tor-dev] Using Traceroute for AS-Path prediction

2015-03-10 Thread A. Johnson
Hello Simon, > I am a student at the saarland university and currently workin on my bachelor > thesis concerning AS-path prediction using traceroute. > I want to correlate open-source BGP data and corresponding traceroute > measurements. In the end I want to argue whether or not traceroute > can

Re: [tor-dev] Renaming arm

2015-03-10 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:03:48PM -0700, Damian Johnson wrote: > > Does it backronym to anything? Can it? ;) > > Roger's been attempting to come up with a decent backronym all day. > Can't say I care, but if somebody comes up with a really good one then > happy to adopt it. safely explain tor's

Re: [tor-dev] Renaming arm

2015-03-10 Thread Damian Johnson
> Does it backronym to anything? Can it? ;) Roger's been attempting to come up with a decent backronym all day. Can't say I care, but if somebody comes up with a really good one then happy to adopt it. ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.or

Re: [tor-dev] Questions for the torflow developers

2015-03-10 Thread Francois Valiquette
Thank you Philipp and Damian for your response. I will inform you about the outcome of our work. Frank On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:02 PM Philipp Winter wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:15:21PM +, Francois Valiquette wrote: > > By reading the documentation of torflow, it is yet not clear to

[tor-dev] Renaming arm

2015-03-10 Thread Damian Johnson
Hmmm, thread about something as squishing and infinitely debatable as a name. What could go wrong? But before you get excited I've already picked one, this is just to sanity check with the community that I'm not making a stupid mistake... again. Five years ago when I started arm [1] I had the foll

Re: [tor-dev] #9321 changes not included in tor-0.2.6.3-alpha changelog

2015-03-10 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:07 AM, George Kadianakis wrote: > Hello Nick, > > I noticed that the 0.2.6.3 changelog does not contain the > guardfraction blurb of #9321. I think this happened in > c2312f4f5fbc37581180f53fb67edb70f3360104 where the bug9321 file was > deleted but its contents were not a

[tor-dev] #9321 changes not included in tor-0.2.6.3-alpha changelog

2015-03-10 Thread George Kadianakis
Hello Nick, I noticed that the 0.2.6.3 changelog does not contain the guardfraction blurb of #9321. I think this happened in c2312f4f5fbc37581180f53fb67edb70f3360104 where the bug9321 file was deleted but its contents were not added to the changelog. The text that is missing is: o Major featur