On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:06:37 +, carlo von lynX wrote:
> the advantages of that aren't obvious to me. why would i need to
> make every networking app hold the hand of its router to let it
> know it's still needed?
You answer your question yourself:
> tor is on its way to becoming an AF_TO
> > Concerning the "ephemerality" of it, I can imagine services
> > being configured en passant by a cat >> socket from a shell
> > script or so, [..]
>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:05:38PM +0400, meejah wrote:
> You still need to authenticate. I do like the simplicity, but it will be
> a little mo
As a followup to this, I told Guatham I would consider mentoring this
(pending an actual GSoC project submission).
It would be nice to have a co-mentor who has better admin skills that me
and ideally who has hosted "real" onion services in the past to provide
perspective on use-cases and needs. I
carlo von lynX writes:
I like your suggestion, and while we're bikeshedding ;) what if we use
the recently-proposed naming system and call it "ADD_ONION"?
> Concerning the "ephemerality" of it, I can imagine services
> being configured en passant by a cat >> socket from a shell
> script or so,
Hi, all!
Work on the Tor 0.2.6.x release series will proceed on the
"maint-0.2.6" branch; releases will be build against "release-0.2.6".
The master branch new has Tor 0.2.7.0-alpha-dev.
cheers,
--
Nick
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torprojec
