Re: [tor-dev] Tor Project Idea | GSOC 2015 | Panopticlick | fake fingerprint

I think I like this idea.. Well done. On Wednesday, February 11, 2015, Rohit Dua <8ohit@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > > I'm Rohit from India, aspiring for gsoc-2015(TOR). This will be my 2nd > consecutive year for gsoc participation. Previous mediawiki. Project:BUB > tool

[tor-dev] Tor Project Idea | GSOC 2015 | Panopticlick | fake fingerprint

Hello I'm Rohit from India, aspiring for gsoc-2015(TOR). This will be my 2nd consecutive year for gsoc participation. Previous mediawiki. Project:BUB tool I stumbled across Panopticlick related project

Re: [tor-dev] A proposal to change hidden service terminology

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 01:36:35PM -0500, A. Johnson wrote: [snip] > > >>> I have heard someone (forget who) propose that 'Dark Web' be > >>> dropped in favour of CipherSpace which could include all of these > >>> privacy perserving protocols, leaving terms like "OnionSpace" for > >>> Tor, "I2P

Re: [tor-dev] [ooni-dev] Let's come up with the roadmap for the future of OONI

Arturo Filastò writes: > Hello Oonitarians and Divisionists, > > I would love to have your feedback on what you believe to be the most > important topics for the future of OONI. > > I have made a list of what I believe are all possible and interesting > tasks to perform, but we can't do them all

Re: [tor-dev] A proposal to change hidden service terminology

>> It is interesting that you raise this, because we at I2P have been >> thinking the same thing. We discussed the issue of I2P terminology at >> 31C3 and decided that after 12 years of Tor/I2P coexistence, Tor had >> the upper hand with regard to commonplace terminology. >> >> In our next release

Re: [tor-dev] A proposal to change hidden service terminology

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:52:37AM +, str4d wrote: > > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > A. Johnson wrote: > > > >> Several of us [0] working on hidden services have been talking > >> about adopting better terminology. > > > > In general, I am in agreement with this, but I wonder if now might

Re: [tor-dev] A proposal to change hidden service terminology

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > A. Johnson wrote: > >> Several of us [0] working on hidden services have been talking >> about adopting better terminology. > > In general, I am in agreement with this, but I wonder if now might > be a good time to un

Re: [tor-dev] A proposal to change hidden service terminology

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> Several of us [0] working on hidden services have been talking about >> adopting better terminology. > > In general, I am in agreement with this, but I wonder if now might be > a good time to unify Tor terminology with other similar te