On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 02:57:19PM -0800, David Fifield wrote:
> What's a good way to inform support of issues that users might run into?
> Should I just send email to h...@rt.torproject.org, or is there a better
> way?
>
> I was thinking about this today because meek is broken in the 4.5-alpha
>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:11:25PM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
>> FYI, between here there was thread tor-talk 'many new relays' of possible
>> event around end 2009-06 to begining 2009-07. Along with usual posts
>> of people about potential thin
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Michael Rogers
wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation.
I think I have more comment address this subsection...
>> If anyone knows of networks (whether active, defunct or
>> discredited) that have used link filling, I'd like a reference.
>> Someone out there has to ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/01/15 06:03, grarpamp wrote:
>> If that's what you're suggesting, then what happens if a client
>> wants to extend a circuit from relay A to relay B, but A and B
>> aren't exchanging chaff with each other?
>
> This doesn't happen. You have a l
All,
In December consensus weight of many nodes suddenly dropped. Using the
onionoo database I have calculated the average consensus weight during
18-25 october 2014, and the average consensus weight during 11-18 january
2015 of all relays that exist longer than half a year and sorted them by
the
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:11:25PM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Philipp Winter wrote:
> > The median amount of new fingerprints in a consensus is six. The
> > Here are some preliminary notes about the most significant spikes. I'll
>
> > 2008-10-25: Missing consensu
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 01:34:01PM -0800, David Fifield wrote:
> Maybe the checker should also check for when a lot of relays go away at
> once. It looks that happened in mid-April, where relays that had been
> started at different times in the beginning of the year all stopped at
> once.
>
> (Oh,
