On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Philipp Winter wrote:
> The median amount of new fingerprints in a consensus is six. The
> Here are some preliminary notes about the most significant spikes. I'll
> 2008-10-25: Missing consensuses.
FYI, between here there was thread tor-talk 'many new relays'
> I am beginning to think that AnonStats2 is not secure enough to use.
But I have come up with a possible replacement. Let’s call it AnonStats3.
AnonStats3 works in conjunction with AnonStats1. It provides a rough estimate
of the statistic that probably is most useful as a sanity check on AnonSt
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 02:29:28PM +0100, Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:24:58PM +0100, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> > Interestingly, that paints a completely different picture. I added
> > that line to two machines (guard+exit) and after a few minutes :
> >
> > # cat /var/lib/t
I reimplemented doctor's sybil checker [0] in Go [1] which makes it
possible to (somewhat) quickly analyse archived consensuses. The
algorithm is quite simple. It iterates over every consensus ever
published, keeps track of all relay fingerprints, and tells us how many
previously unseen relay fin
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:24:58PM +0100, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
> Interestingly, that paints a completely different picture. I added
> that line to two machines (guard+exit) and after a few minutes :
>
> # cat /var/lib/tor/node*/infolog | grep Negotiated | awk '{ print $8
> }' | sort | uniq -d
yes, that's right.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:16 PM, teor wrote:
>
> On 15 Jan 2015, at 01:02 , tor-dev-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:28:22 +0100
> > From: Mohiuddin Ebna Kawsar
> > Subject: Re: [tor-dev] how to simulate TOR network through chutney?
> >
> >
