On Fri, 2 Jan 2015 18:15:06 -0500
grarpamp wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 09:09:34AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> >> Some recent FreeBSD related questions in this app area.
> >>
> > What is the question ?
> >
> > As a background, I
Hi Vlad,
I agree. AWS pricing is not friendly for bandwidth users. However, it
is free for the first year of use and the general population is not
taking advantage of this. Which, AFACT, is one of the points of the
Tor Cloud project. Once you are not free-tier eligible, I highly
recommend using a
Hi Jeremy, I've working on something related so I figured I'd comment. I've
been working on a TorCloud replacement using DigitalOcean's API, this has
the benefit of a simplified set-up process (one-click set-up) and the
pricing on bandwidth is a major win over AWS ($5 for 1TB U/L instead of $20
for
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 09:09:34AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
>> Some recent FreeBSD related questions in this app area.
>>
> What is the question ?
>
> As a background, I can repeat that FreeBSD implements syscall-less
> gettimeofday() and
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Tom van der Woerdt wrote:
>>Now, maybe we _should_ drop support for versions before
>> 0.2.3.17-beta as well. If so, we can rip out even more code. (And
>> that might be a good idea.) What do people on the list think?
X Fabio:
X The cleaner, the better!
> I
On 01/02/2015 05:20 AM, Yawning Angel wrote:
> So while optimization is cool and all, I'm not seeing why this
> specifically is the underlying issue.
A lot of people have been reporting underperformance on OpenBSD, and
time syscalls are a very common source of performance discrepancy
between Linux
Nick Mathewson schreef op 02/01/15 om 15:27:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Tom van der
Woerdt wrote:
Sounds good!
I spent some time writing a patch that removes v1 of the link protocol from
both the server and client, and so far it seems to work nicely: the code
compiles nicely, all test c
On 1/2/15 3:27 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Now, maybe we _should_ drop support for versions before
> 0.2.3.17-beta as well. If so, we can rip out even more code. (And
> that might be a good idea.) What do people on the list think?
The cleaner, the better!
Fabio
I would be willing to take a look at and work the clock cleanup if you guys
where able to give me some ideas on where I should start and focused on the
clean up and rewrite
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 2, 2015, at 2:20 AM, Yawning Angel wrote:
>
> On Thu, 01 Jan 2015 23:42:42 -0500
> Libert
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:31 AM, spriver wrote:
> Hey everyone out there,
>
> as given in the topic, are there any easy research tasks to start with? Or
> is somewhere some help needed?
Some of the project ideas towards the bottom of
https://www.torproject.org/getinvolved/volunteer are easy, and s
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Tom van der
Woerdt wrote:
>
> Sounds good!
>
> I spent some time writing a patch that removes v1 of the link protocol from
> both the server and client, and so far it seems to work nicely: the code
> compiles nicely, all test cases pass, and the resulting binary ha
On 2 Jan 2015, at 23:18 , teor wrote:
>
>> From: Yawning Angel
>> Subject: Re: [tor-dev] gettimeofday() Syscall Issues
>>
>> On Thu, 01 Jan 2015 23:42:42 -0500
>> Libertas wrote:
>>
>>> The first two account for the bulk of the calls, as they are in the
>>> core data relaying logic.
>>>
>>
On Fri, 2 Jan 2015 23:18:16 +1100
teor wrote:
> IPredator has complained that tor on Linux spends too much time
> calling time() when pushing 500Mbit/s, which is an issue for them
> under 3.x series kernels, but not kernel 2.6.
>
> https://ipredator.se/guide/torserver#performance
I really don't
> From: Yawning Angel
> Subject: Re: [tor-dev] gettimeofday() Syscall Issues
>
> On Thu, 01 Jan 2015 23:42:42 -0500
> Libertas wrote:
>
>> The first two account for the bulk of the calls, as they are in the
>> core data relaying logic.
>>
>> Ultimately, the problem seems to be that the cachin
Hey everyone out there,
as given in the topic, are there any easy research tasks to start with?
Or is somewhere some help needed?
Cheers,
spriver
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
On Thu, 01 Jan 2015 23:42:42 -0500
Libertas wrote:
> The first two account for the bulk of the calls, as they are in the
> core data relaying logic.
>
> Ultimately, the problem seems to be that the caching is very weak. At
> most, only half of the calls to tor_gettimeofday_cached_monotonic()
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
