On 11/14/14, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> On 11/15/14, Lee wrote:
>>> c) Get .onion IANA reserved
>>
>> It doesn't look like that's going to happen.
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names/
>> is expired & I haven't been able to find anything indicating it's
>
On 11/15/14, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Fair. What are your thoughts about possible trade-offs with anonymity when
> using a CA-signed cert?
>
I have many. It won't impact client anonymity from where I stand and
it will ease usability for certain use cases.
All in all, I welcome the CA cartels signi
Fair. What are your thoughts about possible trade-offs with anonymity when
using a CA-signed cert?
On November 14, 2014 9:38:02 PM EST, Jacob Appelbaum
wrote:
>On 11/15/14, Griffin Boyce wrote:
>> Lee wrote:
c) Get .onion IANA reserved
>>>
>>> It doesn't look like that's going to happen.
On 11/15/14, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Lee wrote:
>>> c) Get .onion IANA reserved
>>
>> It doesn't look like that's going to happen.
>
>Yeah. Though the biggest use-case for cert+onion is when trying to
> match a clearnet service to a hidden service -- such as Facebook or
> Erowid.
>
That is fal
On 11/15/14, Lee wrote:
>> c) Get .onion IANA reserved
>
> It doesn't look like that's going to happen.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names/
> is expired & I haven't been able to find anything indicating it's
> still being considered.
It's still somethin
Lee wrote:
c) Get .onion IANA reserved
It doesn't look like that's going to happen.
Yeah. Though the biggest use-case for cert+onion is when trying to
match a clearnet service to a hidden service -- such as Facebook or
Erowid.
~Griffin
___
tor
> c) Get .onion IANA reserved
It doesn't look like that's going to happen.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names/
is expired & I haven't been able to find anything indicating it's
still being considered.
See the "existing requests/RFC 6761 process:" section h
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:50:20AM +, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
| On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Adam Shostack wrote:
| > Hi,
|
| Hi Adam,
|
| > I just had the fun experience of trying to walk someone who's not very
| > technical and not familiar with Tor through downloading and installing
|
Hi Tom, thanks for the great summary.
I want to comment on one element of your writeup, the hidden service
on box A, webserver on box B. My weak belief is that this is no
different than the "SSL added and removed here" issue which impacts
many 'secure sites.'
Imposing a requirement that a person
Great summary Tom,
>From my perspective, getting .onion reserved is a pretty high priority. Once
>reserved, we can really eliminate it as an internal name and get onion listed
>as part of the PSL. I'm happy to help with this part of the project if I can.
>Syrup-tan had an idea on irc: Have a
There's been a spirited debate on irc, so I thought I would try and
capture my thoughts in long form. I think it's important to look at
the long-term goals rather than how to get there, so that's where I'm
going to start, and then at each item maybe talk a little bit about
how to get there. So I t
11 matches
Mail list logo
