On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 03:29:51PM +1100, teor wrote:
>
> > * Some compilers for weird old hardware have never been upgraded to
> > even rudimentary C99 support, and trying to build code with those
> > weird old compilers is a good way to expose some bugs. I sympathize
> > with this too: there wa
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 03:29:51PM +1100, teor wrote:
|
| On 18 Oct 2014, at 13:29 , tor-dev-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
| > Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:29:02 -0400
| > From: Nick Mathewson
| > To: tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
| > Subject: Re: [tor-dev] Building TOR using Visual Studio
|
|
teor:
> Nick Mathewson:
> > * Some people want to use paid versions of Visual Studio, and have
> > paid for a version earlier than VS2013, and don't want to pay for a
> > newer one. I sympathize with this: I've been on paid upgrade
> > treadmills myself, and it's always tempting to save money by
On 18 Oct 2014, at 06:29, teor wrote:
> Are there no-cost, non-license-restricted compilers available for Windows
> that support C99?
>
> This could be a way out for those who don't wish to pay for the VS 2013
> upgrade.
>
> But it's a bit more of a barrier than using an existing compiler on
teor wrote:
> Are there no-cost, non-license-restricted compilers available for Windows
> that support C99?
Yes, the MinGW compilers fit the bill.
Erik
--
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
___
