Re: [tor-dev] Building TOR using Visual Studio

2014-10-17 Thread teor
On 18 Oct 2014, at 13:29 , tor-dev-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote: > Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:29:02 -0400 > From: Nick Mathewson > To: tor-dev@lists.torproject.org > Subject: Re: [tor-dev] Building TOR using Visual Studio > * Some people want to use paid versions of Visual Studio, and have

Re: [tor-dev] Building TOR using Visual Studio

2014-10-17 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Nick Mathewson wrote: > Keep in mind that C99 is 15 years old now. > Personally, I think I'm still inclined to say that the day for a more > modern style has arrived. I'm totally with you on this. I've been coding C to meet the C99 standards since the mid-2000s :-). Erik -- -

Re: [tor-dev] Building TOR using Visual Studio

2014-10-17 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > teor wrote: > >> I just looked over this patch and it looks safe and simple to commit >> (haven't have a chance to compile it yet though). >> The correct order of declaration, asserts, and initialisation / >> assignment has been preserv

Re: [tor-dev] Building TOR using Visual Studio

2014-10-17 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
teor wrote: > I just looked over this patch and it looks safe and simple to commit > (haven't have a chance to compile it yet though). > The correct order of declaration, asserts, and initialisation / > assignment has been preserved in the code. > > If we commit this patch, we should probably cha

Re: [tor-dev] Building TOR using Visual Studio

2014-10-17 Thread Владимир Мартьянов
VS2013 if definetely able to compile the TOR without any serious problem. 2014-10-17 20:55 GMT+04:00 Sebastian Hahn : > > On 17 Oct 2014, at 18:07, M. Ziebell wrote: > > > Looking at this blog post [1] even the support for C99 in VS2013 is > > limited. I don't know if tor hit the limitations, th

Re: [tor-dev] Building TOR using Visual Studio

2014-10-17 Thread Sebastian Hahn
On 17 Oct 2014, at 18:07, M. Ziebell wrote: > Looking at this blog post [1] even the support for C99 in VS2013 is > limited. I don't know if tor hit the limitations, that's for you to > decide. > > C99 is 15 years old ... It should be "sane" to use it. Please also see bug #13260 and its friend

Re: [tor-dev] Building TOR using Visual Studio

2014-10-17 Thread M. Ziebell
Looking at this blog post [1] even the support for C99 in VS2013 is limited. I don't know if tor hit the limitations, that's for you to decide. C99 is 15 years old ... It should be "sane" to use it. [1] https://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2013/07/19/c99-library-support-in-visual-studio-2013

[tor-dev] ooniprobe v1.2.2 is out

2014-10-17 Thread Arturo Filastò
Hi all, This mail is to inform you that a new version of ooniprobe has just been released. Here is the changelog: v1.2.2 (Fri, 17 Oct 2014) - Who said friday 17th is only bad luck? * Add two new report entry keys test_start_time and test_runtime * Fix bug that lead to

Re: [tor-dev] Building TOR using Visual Studio

2014-10-17 Thread teor
contained instruction to run > ./configure, but there's no such file. > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20141017/5a83dd81/attachment-0001.html> > -

Re: [tor-dev] Building TOR using Visual Studio

2014-10-17 Thread Владимир Мартьянов
VS2013 if free only in Express version, and Express version is limited: doesn't have a profiler, for example. Moreover, there are limitations for using Express version, it's written in license. I'v attached a diff where I changed a code for VS2008 (tested on ubuntu-64 gcc 4.8.2 too). Also I change