merc1...@f-m.fm:
>
> Does anyone know why TOR does not use DNSSEC? The only documentation I
> found on the TORProject website for DNS does not actually explain how
> DNS works on TOR. I infer it must be TCP, as TOR can not do UDP, and I
> imagine that relay nodes must be the resolvers in order t
Does anyone know why TOR does not use DNSSEC? The only documentation I
found on the TORProject website for DNS does not actually explain how
DNS works on TOR. I infer it must be TCP, as TOR can not do UDP, and I
imagine that relay nodes must be the resolvers in order to resolve
.onion domains.
Cool, I thought of that, too. Sounds like a workable thing to do. I will keep
the master branch of OnionPy clean and working (modulo bugs) so you should be
fine just using that. I'll set up a way to run the tor-weather tests before I
push a new version of OnionPy.
Would you like me to fork tor
Lukas Erlacher writes:
>> 1. remove local copy of OnionPy and replace with real thing
> That means we need to get OnionPy packaged and into wheezy-backports,
> no?
Medium-term, yes.
We can use it as a (git) submodule of tor-weather meantime (e.g. until
we're reasonably sure the API is fine)
It's already been reported. See
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12994
---
GPG/PGP Fingerprint
E129 722B A512 105C E8BE
4705 8046 EA48 2C82 1339
https://arlen.io/key
On Aug 30, 2014 11:43 AM, "Lampshade" wrote:
>
> pub 2048R/886DDD89 2009-09-04 [expires: 2014-09-03]
>
pub 2048R/886DDD89 2009-09-04 [expires: 2014-09-03]
Key fingerprint = A3C4 F0F9 79CA A22C DBA8 F512 EE8C BC9E 886D DD89
uid deb.torproject.org archive signing key
sub 2048R/219EC810 2009-09-04 [expires: 2014-08-29]
Above text is from https://www.torproject.o
Hi!
I've been meaning to catch you to talk about tor-weather. Sadly, spare cycles
are rare for me, too.
On 08/30/2014 12:55 AM, meejah wrote:
Now that GSoC is over, there are some things that should be accomplished
in the Tor Weather codebase soon to reach "deployment":
1. remove local co
