On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 11:24:32AM -0400, Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 11:37:45AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> > Started looking into better algorithms to detect Sybil attacks on the
> > Tor network. Current thinking is that we should define relay similarity
> > metrics like
There's a couple posts here.
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2014-July/005034.html
I'd also include uptimes.
Larger byproduct: you can say what ISP/AS do not have relays in order
to see about putting ones therein.
___
tor-dev mailing li
On 05/08/14 17:24, Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 11:37:45AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>> Started looking into better algorithms to detect Sybil attacks on the
>> Tor network. Current thinking is that we should define relay similarity
>> metrics like common IP address prefix l
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 11:07:57AM -0400, Mark Smith wrote:
> On 8/3/14, 2:37 AM, David Fifield wrote:
> >On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 11:28:08PM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
> >>I made some test meek bundles that are capable of using the Amazon
> >>CloudFront CDN as a backend, in addition to Google App
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 11:37:45AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Started looking into better algorithms to detect Sybil attacks on the
> Tor network. Current thinking is that we should define relay similarity
> metrics like common IP address prefix length or time between first seen
> in a consen
On 8/3/14, 2:37 AM, David Fifield wrote:
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 11:28:08PM -0700, David Fifield wrote:
I made some test meek bundles that are capable of using the Amazon
CloudFront CDN as a backend, in addition to Google App Engine that was
supported before.
https://people.torproject.org/~dcf/
