On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 04:10:50AM +0100, Virgil Griffith wrote:
> Hidden services quickly come to mind.
>
> Are there other candidates? I can imagine people deciding not to view
> certain content through Tor because of speed (e.g., pornhub). But I
> suspect I am missing some use cases.
Hi Virg
Hidden services quickly come to mind.
Are there other candidates? I can imagine people deciding not to view
certain content through Tor because of speed (e.g., pornhub). But I
suspect I am missing some use cases.
-V
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@li
Nima Fatemi transcribed 4.0K bytes:
> isis:
> [...]
> >> Are some of our least technical users, many of whom have never even seen a
> >> command line before and who may live in Sub-Saharan Africa or one of the
> >> Stan countries with only a rudimentary knowledge of English going to
> >> understand
* Thunderbird autoconfiguraticon.
* Web Server.
* User subscription webpages.
* Full integrated PGP key generation and keyServer sender.
* Mail Queue (onli exit/enter server).
* Bash OnionMail Setup wizard.
* And much more...
You can activate an OnionMail server in 5 minutes!
You can create a new
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:48:21 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Roger Dingledine
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:24:47PM +0100, Noel David Torres Taño
> > wrote:
> >> What would happen if a Tor node changes behaviour and uses four or
> >> five relay steps instead of
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:24:47PM +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
>> What would happen if a Tor node changes behaviour and uses four or five
>> relay steps instead of three?
At around DEFAULT_ROUTE_LEN 8 or above I get a lot of thes
Hi.
I support what Philipp and Nima say about keywords. The given commands
surely look simple for technical users, but what about non-technical users?
If the purpose of the distributor is to give info, and you're already
filtering emails to *try* to avoid fake requests (correct if i'm wrong),
then
Nima Fatemi :
>
> I think "bridges" works just fine for "vanilla bridges" and I want to
> take the opportunity to +1 Philipp's idea on looking for keywords
> instead of commands, regardless of how they're phrased.
Help desk frequently sees bridge keywords in other
(supported/unsupported) language
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 01:55:43PM +0100, Gareth Owen wrote:
> Andrea
>
> Thanks for taking the time to reply and for the advice. I have just this
> second discovered this method:
>
> TO_OR_CIRCUIT(circ)->p_chan->get_remote_descr(TO_OR_CIRCUIT(circ)->p_chan,
> 0)
>
> which returns the endpoint
Andrea
Thanks for taking the time to reply and for the advice. I have just this
second discovered this method:
TO_OR_CIRCUIT(circ)->p_chan->get_remote_descr(TO_OR_CIRCUIT(circ)->p_chan,
0)
which returns the endpoint as a string. I wonder, is this safer/future
proof or should this approach be d
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:20:52PM +0100, Gareth Owen wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Quick question, how does one turn channel_t into an IP address, e.g. given
> a circuit_t how do I get the IP address of the previous and next hop
> (noting that they might not be in the consensus so I cant use the identity
>
Hi all
Quick question, how does one turn channel_t into an IP address, e.g. given
a circuit_t how do I get the IP address of the previous and next hop
(noting that they might not be in the consensus so I cant use the identity
hash). I can see the information is in the connection_t struct but I do
isis wrote:
Do you have a better suggestion for what to call "vanilla bridges"?
I keep calling them standard bridges (as opposed to fancy,
monocle-wearing bridges). People seem to understand immediately that
other types of bridges are special somehow if I call
regular/vanilla/non-obfs bri
El jue, 24-07-2014 a las 06:54 +, Nima Fatemi escribió:
> isis:
> [...]
> >> Are some of our least technical users, many of whom have never even seen a
> >> command line before and who may live in Sub-Saharan Africa or one of the
> >> Stan countries with only a rudimentary knowledge of English
isis:
[...]
>> Are some of our least technical users, many of whom have never even seen a
>> command line before and who may live in Sub-Saharan Africa or one of the
>> Stan countries with only a rudimentary knowledge of English going to
>> understand the difference between vanilla bridges and, say
Ken Keys transcribed 3.4K bytes:
> On 7/23/2014 10:57 AM, Matt Pagan wrote:
> >
> >>> COMMANDs: (combine COMMANDs to specify multiple options simultaneously)
> >>> get bridgesRequest vanilla bridges.
> >>> get transport [TYPE] Request a Pluggable Transport by TYPE.
> >>> get hel
16 matches
Mail list logo
