Ximin Luo wrote
Sun, 06 Jul 2014 17:06:56 +0100:
| (Disclaimer, I don't know the details of how consensus documents
| work. Some assumptions I made might be wrong.)
|
| In section 2 Motivation, you mention a partition attack. I think the
| rest of the document neglects the topic of *actually pro
(Aside: I think this thread is unrelated enough to tor-dev at this point
that I'm going to make this my last reply.)
On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 14:42 +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Regardless of the moral arguments you put forward, which I
> will not
> comment on, it seems like this
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 02:19:27PM +0300, George Kadianakis wrote:
> Here are some ideas on various achievements/badges that could be
> awarded to relay operators (in no particular order):
>
> - You earned a flag (fast/hsdir/stable/named/exit)!
> - Your uptime is over 9000 (seconds/days/months)!
>
Let me try again more concisely:
Whats the most minimal (fastest) way to generate ‘orconfig.h' and 'or_sha1.i’
from a clean git clone of Tor master? Is there a make target for this?
-Rob
On Jul 11, 2014, at 5:17 PM, Rob Jansen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shadow uses CMake and a custom build process to
>
> Regardless of the moral arguments you put forward, which I will not
> comment on, it seems like this idea would never be implemented because
> none of the Tor developers have a desire to implement such a dangerous
> feature.
>
I can argue that the lack of it is also dangerous, actually. It amo
Am 2014-06-10 02:26, schrieb Virgil Griffith:
> For a while I've been seeking to grow the Tor network in both size and
> goodput. Towards this end, I've explored various avenues such as
> increasing user-awareness via tor2web. More recently, I've been exploring
> financial incentives like TorCoin
