Hi everyone,
Is there any project in little-t tor that needs another hacker? I have
(under another name) been writing tor unit tests, which I've "finished".
What should I work on next? Happy to work on either new code or more unit
tests.
I'm also reasonably skilled with python, if any pythonic pr
Damian Johnson transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> This is for extrainfo descriptors, not server descriptors. Do bridges
> publish extrainfo descriptors?
Oh. That wasn't clear to me from the proposal, but I must have simply
missed it.
Yes, bridges do publish extrainfo descriptors. BridgeDB parses those
as
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 07:51:49PM +0300, George Kadianakis wrote:
> Hello Roger and Nick,
>
> as far as I know, bridge support was hastily implemented in
> little-t-tor, and it does not support all the features we would like
> it to support.
>
> During the dev meeting roadmapping, we added a tas
Interesting! It is not a fundamental error per say, if you are a server
you can't handle more than some number of connections anyway (you can
increase that if you are root), so the client need to wait. You need a
ddos defence mechanism against that (e.g. iptables) independent of what
kind of server
Maybe having 12 tabs open while downloading TBB did it?
On Jul 14, 2014 4:46 PM, wrote:
> Interesting! It is not a fundamental error per say, if you are a server
> you can't handle more than some number of connections anyway (you can
> increase that if you are root), so the client need to wait. Y
> 0. Does this proposal include adding these additional `X-*` fields to
> the `@type bridge-server-descriptor`s as well? Or only to the
> non-bridge server-descriptors?
This is for extrainfo descriptors, not server descriptors. Do bridges
publish extrainfo descriptors?
> 1. Why 5KB?
>
>
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:30:06 -0700
Kevin P Dyer wrote:
(This is orthogonal to the bridge code, but since you asked...)
> I would like to be able to bind to privileged ports when running a
> PT-enabled bridge in managed mode --- will any changes to
> little-t-tor be required for this feature?
(A
Ian Goldberg transcribed 1.2K bytes:
> > There may need to be a maximum sum length of the X- entries. This is
> > left to the developers. I propose a maximum sum length of 5 kilobytes.
A couple questions:
0. Does this proposal include adding these additional `X-*` fields to
the `@type bri
I would like to be able to bind to privileged ports when running a
PT-enabled bridge in managed mode --- will any changes to little-t-tor be
required for this feature?
-Kevin
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:51 AM, George Kadianakis
wrote:
> Hello Roger and Nick,
>
> as far as I know, bridge support
This email is to announce the first public release of Syboa[1], a tor
controller for monitoring a local daemon instance. My primary motivation
for Syboa was to replace TorK, so it looks[2] more like TorK than Vidalia.
Syboa is not ready for non-developer users[3]. But after seeing the "UX
Idea - A
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:01:23PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 07:20:29PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> >> >/* Don't actually allow compression; it uses ram and time, but the
> >> > data
> >> > * we transmit is all e
11 matches
Mail list logo
