Hi,
Shadow uses CMake and a custom build process to build the Tor source files into
a shadow-plugin (using Clang/LLVM and a custom pass). However, because my CMake
build file is not smart enough to know how to turn orconfig.h.in into
orconfig.h, I still have to run Tor through autotools first (
Hello Roger and Nick,
as far as I know, bridge support was hastily implemented in
little-t-tor, and it does not support all the features we would like
it to support.
During the dev meeting roadmapping, we added a task about improving
the bridge implementation in Tor. Some of the items in the task
Hi Yuhao,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 08:20:25PM +0800, Yuhao Dong wrote:
> I'm Yuhao Dong (undergrad student at University of Waterloo) and I'm
> currently doing research on, surprise, my own traffic obfuscation
> system.
Cool! I'm in Toronto until the middle of August -- in case you are back
until
"Sebastian G. " writes:
> 11.07.2014 14:31, Ian Goldberg:
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:44:36PM +0300, George Kadianakis wrote:
>>> Hey Nick,
>>>
>>> this mail is about the schemes we were discussing during the dev
>>> meeting on how to protect HSes against guard discovery attacks (#9001).
>>> (.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 08:31:05AM -0400, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:44:36PM +0300, George Kadianakis wrote:
> > Hey Nick,
> >
> > this mail is about the schemes we were discussing during the dev
> > meeting on how to protect HSes against guard discovery attacks (#9001).
> >
11.07.2014 14:31, Ian Goldberg:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:44:36PM +0300, George Kadianakis wrote:
>> Hey Nick,
>>
>> this mail is about the schemes we were discussing during the dev
>> meeting on how to protect HSes against guard discovery attacks (#9001).
>> (...)
HS stands for hidden-service,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:44:36PM +0300, George Kadianakis wrote:
> Hey Nick,
>
> this mail is about the schemes we were discussing during the dev
> meeting on how to protect HSes against guard discovery attacks (#9001).
>
> I think we have some ideas on how to offer better protection against
>
Hey Nick,
this mail is about the schemes we were discussing during the dev
meeting on how to protect HSes against guard discovery attacks (#9001).
I think we have some ideas on how to offer better protection against
such attacks, mainly by keeping our middle nodes more static than we
do currently
