>
>
> https://check.torproject.org/RecommendedTBBVersions
>
> By the way there is python and bash parsing code available already.
>
>
Thanks! Where can I find these codes?
Regards.
> Cheers,
> Patrick
>
> ___
> tor-dev mailing list
> tor-dev@lists.tor
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:26:09PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> It would break an assumption in our current directory
> model, and breaking assumptions like that (that directories are
> allowed to not know things) make me a bit nervous.
I wonder if that ship already sailed when we moved to the
Israel Leiva:
> Is there a better way to get a link for the latest TBB rather than looking
> at https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/? I'm thinking on something
> easy to automate (for the Revamp GetTor project).
https://check.torproject.org/RecommendedTBBVersions
By the way there is python
Hi all!
Is there a better way to get a link for the latest TBB rather than looking
at https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/? I'm thinking on something
easy to automate (for the Revamp GetTor project).
Thanks!
--
israel
___
tor-dev mailing list
t
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:50 PM, George Kadianakis wrote:
> Nick Mathewson writes:
>
>> Hi, all!
>>
>> I noticed that proposal 236 doesn't mention directory guards. (See
>> proposal 207, implemented in Tor 0.2.4.) I think that we should
>> consider retaining multiple directory guards while going
Nick Mathewson writes:
> Hi, all!
>
> I noticed that proposal 236 doesn't mention directory guards. (See
> proposal 207, implemented in Tor 0.2.4.) I think that we should
> consider retaining multiple directory guards while going to a single
> guard for multi-hop circuits.
>
> My rationale here
Hello list.
I don't get any FAILED tests running on Win32 (MSVC), but IMHO the use
of '\\' in the TEMP-directory doesn't look quite kosher (looks a bit like a
"\\server\share\path" UNC-syntax).
From test_crypto_pk() running 'test.exe --warn':
Jun 05 10:13:05.046 [warn] Could not open
"F:\TE
