-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/05/14 17:32, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> What about the attack suggested by waldo, where a malicious IP
>> repeatedly breaks the circuit until it's rebuilt through a
>> malicious middle node? Are entry guards enough to protect the
>> service'
On 07/05/14 13:51, Michael Rogers wrote:
> On 06/05/14 22:17, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> If so, then yes. When I implemented the deterministic selection of
>> introduction points, I had to implement a reconnection mechanism
>> to ensure that the introduction point would only be changed if it
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/05/14 22:07, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 06/05/14 15:29, Michael Rogers wrote:
>> Does this mean that at present, the service builds a new IP
>> circuit (to a new IP?) every time it receives a connection? If
>> so, is it the IP or the servic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/05/14 22:17, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 06/05/14 22:07, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> On 06/05/14 15:29, Michael Rogers wrote:
>>> I'm interested in your work because the hidden service
>>> protocol doesn't seem to perform very well for hidd
