Hi everyone!
This is the release candidate 7 for torsocks 2.x. Nothing major, fixes
and some code refactoring went in.
From this point on, the upstream torsocks git[1] is now updated with
that new code in the master branch but no stable release yet. With that,
my github repository will become a m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/04/14 16:45, Nathan Freitas wrote:
> On 04/04/2014 11:34 AM, Damian Johnson wrote:
>> Nathan, should Michael go ahead and file his pull request with
>> the Orbot component then?
>
> Sure! We can keep the JtorCtl repo on its own, and perhaps mo
On 04/04/2014 11:34 AM, Damian Johnson wrote:
> Nathan, should Michael go ahead and file his pull request with the
> Orbot component then?
Sure! We can keep the JtorCtl repo on its own, and perhaps move it out
of the attic.
I will review patches, test and merge.
> *ahem* Orbot represents 2 million users of jtorctl, and it works just
> fine for us (in our limited use of it).
>
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/orbot.git/tree/HEAD:/external
Yay, sounds like we found a new owner for JTorCtl! ;)
Nathan, should Michael go ahead and file his pull request with th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/04/14 15:44, Nathan Freitas wrote:
> *ahem* Orbot represents 2 million users of jtorctl, and it works
> just fine for us (in our limited use of it).
>
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/orbot.git/tree/HEAD:/external
Hehe, I was just this second
On 04/04/2014 02:54 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Wow, JTorCtl is probably not just unmaintained, but also probably
> doesn't have a single application using it since 2009. There's a reason
> why it's sorted into the "Attic" group on https://gitweb.torproject.org/.
*ahem* Orbot represents 2 millio
Hey Noah,
For committing:
I think Zack needs to give you write access. Please send your github id
to Zack (za...@cmu.edu) and cc me. Once that is done, please branch out
of tor-improve and commit. If it takes Zack long to give you permission,
you can just fork Zackw/stegotorus of course. Just ple
Hey Zack and Roger,
- Why moving:
The goal of moving wasn't to disassociate the project from Zack. I wanted
to advertise the project link on the volunteer page and I thought, there
will be less confusion if it is in the TheTorProject than in Zackw. I
asked Arturo to fork Stegotorus in TheTorProjec
A short summary of the discussion on IRC:
It is generally considered a good idea to better encode data in Tor's control
protocol. In this case Protocol Buffers probably is more suitable for data
serialization than JSON. Though Flask seems to be a nice prototyping
framework, security concerns wer
On 04/04/14 04:02, Damian Johnson wrote:
> Hi Michael, glad you want to help! JTorCtl is pretty much unmaintained
> (it was last committed to in 2009), but if you file a ticket on
> https://trac.torproject.org we might be able to get it merged.
>
> Karsten, you're the last person to touch that pro
10 matches
Mail list logo
