-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/03/2014 02:17 PM, Lei Yang wrote:
> I'm wondering are there any Tor routers which are implemented in
> Java?
Orchid[0] is the Java implementation of Tor. In general it is working
well; we have packaged it as an I2P plugin[1] to provide easy ou
Hi,
I'm wondering are there any Tor routers which are implemented in Java?
Thanks,
Lei
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
On 02/04/14 15:48, Nikita Borisov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Christian wrote:
>>> Average graph data sounds good. (If you're cutting off values left to
>>> x_start as discussed above, be sure to exclude them from the average.)
>>>
>>
>> I updated the #11349 build with average data:
On 02 Apr 2014, at 15:40, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 02/04/14 11:46, thomas lörtsch wrote:
>> nice work! One nitpick: if the legend to the left was colour coded
>> like the graphs I would not need to hover over the graphs to see
>> which curve reflects which category.
>
> Right, I asked the sa
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Christian wrote:
>> Average graph data sounds good. (If you're cutting off values left to
>> x_start as discussed above, be sure to exclude them from the average.)
>>
>
> I updated the #11349 build with average data:
>
> http://globe.rndm.de/canary/index-11349.html
On 02/04/14 11:46, thomas lörtsch wrote:
> nice work! One nitpick: if the legend to the left was colour coded
> like the graphs I would not need to hover over the graphs to see
> which curve reflects which category.
Right, I asked the same thing on the ticket:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects
Hi,
nice work! One nitpick: if the legend to the left was colour coded like the
graphs I would not need to hover over the graphs to see which curve reflects
which category.
I was thinking about how it could be possible to combine all perspectives in
one graphing window. Especially the seperate
On 01/04/14 22:12, Christian wrote:
> On 01.04.2014 09:56, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>>> Do you think it would be better to modify the graphs so all of them
>>> start/end at the same time? (There is a small offset because the first
>>> and last fields aren't always the same)
>>
>> I thought about this
