[tor-dev] Prototype of a next-generation Tor control interface

2014-04-01 Thread ra
Hi, all! Originally, I wrote the proposal for this year's GSoC, but nobody seems willing to mentor it and the idea most probably needs more time to shape. Hence, I post it on this list to get some feedback and let the idea evolve. (: Best, Robert Problem statement Tor's control protocol[0]

Re: [tor-dev] Feedback on recent Globe improvements

2014-04-01 Thread Christian
On 01.04.2014 09:56, Karsten Loesing wrote: >> Do you think it would be better to modify the graphs so all of them >> start/end at the same time? (There is a small offset because the first >> and last fields aren't always the same) > > I thought about this, but didn't bring it up yet, because it m

Re: [tor-dev] Moving ownership to TheTorProject

2014-04-01 Thread Andreas Krey
On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 12:02:23 +, Zack Weinberg wrote: ... > That's not the issue; the issue is that I am unaware of any good way to > tell git to pull or push *all* branches that exist in a particular > remote. Your example > > > [remote "origin"] > > url = g...@github.com:zackw/stegot

Re: [tor-dev] Moving ownership to TheTorProject

2014-04-01 Thread Ian Goldberg
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 12:02:23PM -0400, Zack Weinberg wrote: > On 04/01/2014 11:23 AM, Griffin Boyce wrote: > > In your git config, you can define a pushurl that is different from > > url. Which effectively means that you can pull from github but push > > to tor. > > That's not the issue; the

Re: [tor-dev] Moving ownership to TheTorProject

2014-04-01 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 04/01/2014 11:23 AM, Griffin Boyce wrote: > In your git config, you can define a pushurl that is different from > url. Which effectively means that you can pull from github but push > to tor. That's not the issue; the issue is that I am unaware of any good way to tell git to pull or push *al

Re: [tor-dev] Moving ownership to TheTorProject

2014-04-01 Thread Griffin Boyce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In your git config, you can define a pushurl that is different from url. Which effectively means that you can pull from github but push to tor. So in .git/config, your entry would look something like this (double-check pushurl syntax): [core]

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC Proposal: Relay Web Status Dashboard

2014-04-01 Thread Mark Smith
On 4/1/14, 10:56 AM, Damian Johnson wrote: Also, while snooping around the dev version of Arm, I've noticed a slight glitch in the _get_controller method of __init__.py in arm.util : if not stem.util.system.is_running('tor.real'): raise ValueError(msg('connect.tor_isnt_running')) (I'm

Re: [tor-dev] Moving ownership to TheTorProject

2014-04-01 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 02/20/2014 10:48 AM, vmonmoonsh...@gmail.com wrote: > Hey Zack, > > I want to put up Stegotorus up for GSoC this summer. I was wondering if > you mind transfering the ownership of your Stegotorus repo: > > https://github.com/zackw/stegotorus > > To "TheTorProject" on github: > > https://gith

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC Proposal: Relay Web Status Dashboard

2014-04-01 Thread Damian Johnson
> I have uploaded yet another revision of my proposal. (Sorry about that!) Hi Bang, thanks for the update. The present proposal suggests adapting arm to be the backend of the relay dashboard. We've tried something similar to this before, and it had some drawbacks. In 2011 Kamran made a Tor GTK in

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC Proposal: Relay Web Status Dashboard

2014-04-01 Thread Bang Hui Lim
Hi Damian, I have uploaded yet another revision of my proposal. (Sorry about that!) Also, while snooping around the dev version of Arm, I've noticed a slight glitch in the _get_controller method of __init__.py in arm.util : if not stem.util.system.is_running('tor.real'): raise ValueError(

Re: [tor-dev] Feedback on recent Globe improvements

2014-04-01 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 31/03/14 22:24, Christian wrote: > On 31.03.2014 19:54, Karsten Loesing wrote: >> On 31/03/14 18:38, Christian wrote: >>> Weight, clients and uptime documents from '1_week' to '5_years'. >> >> That's true. But you could use data from the '1_week' lines by skipping >> everything until $(now - 3