Re: [tor-dev] Release Candidate: TBB 3.6 + fteproxy 0.2.6

2014-02-13 Thread David Fifield
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 07:25:47PM +, mikeperry wrote: > I've put a tag on them to review them. It looks like Lunar found an > issue with tor-fw-helper Ubuntu though (see tor-qa). tor-fw-helper is a separate bunch of packages; Kevin's FTE packages don't have anything to do with those. I suspe

Re: [tor-dev] Call for testing/review: obfsclient

2014-02-13 Thread Yawning Angel
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:06:39 +0100 Fabian Keil wrote: > Trying to build it on FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT I get (after a couple > of other issues): FreeBSD has Clang as the default compiler right? I've been using GCC for development, sorry, I should have tested both. > fk@r500 ~/git/obfsclient $make o

Re: [tor-dev] Release Candidate: TBB 3.6 + fteproxy 0.2.6

2014-02-13 Thread mikeperry
I've put a tag on them to review them. It looks like Lunar found an issue with tor-fw-helper Ubuntu though (see tor-qa). Kevin P Dyer: > Hi Mike, > > dcf and I have been working to validate my TBB+fteproxy patch [1]. My patch > results in a build that's deterministic for dcf and I [2]. I've verif

Re: [tor-dev] Release Candidate: TBB 3.6 + fteproxy 0.2.6

2014-02-13 Thread Kevin P Dyer
Hi Mike, dcf and I have been working to validate my TBB+fteproxy patch [1]. My patch results in a build that's deterministic for dcf and I [2]. I've verified that the binaries produced work on their respective target platforms. The TBB+fteproxy repo. is on github [3]. What do you need from me to

Re: [tor-dev] Registering special-use domain names of peer-to-peer name systems with IETF

2014-02-13 Thread John Bond
Hello All, Im writing to the list in response to IETF submission made by christian. This has created much debate on the DNSOPS mailing list[1] and has also seen another draft to be proposed[2]. I will start by saying I see merit in both drafts being proposed[3][4] and don¹t necessarily see them a

Re: [tor-dev] [Discussion] 5 ^H 3 hops rendezvous circuit design

2014-02-13 Thread Paul Syverson
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:43:10PM -0500, Zack Weinberg wrote: > On 02/11/2014 11:53 PM, Paul Syverson wrote: > > The biggest concern is that no matter how you handle the commitment > > and the size of the flexible set, you make it fairly easy for a HS > > simply following this protocol precisely a

Re: [tor-dev] Call for testing/review: obfsclient

2014-02-13 Thread Fabian Keil
Yawning Angel wrote: > obfsclient (https://github.com/yawning/obfsclient) now also supports the > latest and greatest in pluggable transport technology in the form of > ScrambleSuit. > > All 3 transports pass the "Can I watch youtube over it" test. [...] > Comments, Questions, Feedback apprecia