Hi everyone,
Over the last few days there were a few questions raised regarding the
current status of public bridges and their pluggable transports. I've
written a script to gather some data points using the sanitized bridge
descriptors and extrainfo documents provided on metrics.tp.o. If anyone
i
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:16:46PM -0500, Jacob Garber wrote:
> I apologise if this doesn't belong in this list and for my inexperience.
> I am trying to clone the gitian-builder repository to test out the
> deterministic builds, but
> I'm running into an issue:
> "warning: remote HEAD refers to no
I apologise if this doesn't belong in this list and for my inexperience.
I am trying to clone the gitian-builder repository to test out the
deterministic builds, but
I'm running into an issue:
"warning: remote HEAD refers to nonexistent ref, unable to checkout."
It creates the gitian-builder direct
Hello
I found a security issue in Tor.
With Tor Browser Bundle default settings any web-site can access to local
resources by JavaScript and XMLHttpRequest.
For example ANY web-site can scan local ports sending a requests to
http://127.0.0.1:port and see what port is opened.
For example: http:
This would be a nice-to-have, but not a priority for Tor. OTOH, that
functionality is more vital for i2p, who are exploring the idea of integrating
into Tor's PT system:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/10629
Also, right now, no PT servers can actually traverse NAT. In the future
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am pleased to announce that txtorcon v0.9.1 is now available.
This release adds quite a few minor bug-fixes, simplifies GeoIP
handling (with support for both pre- and post 0.3 pygeoip APIs), a
tutorial-style walkthrough, the availability of a "wh
Yes, but the point of flash proxies, is to use them as bridges, what I
meant is to allow OR's behind NAT to be relays or even exit nodes.
2014/1/20 David Fifield
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 05:00:38PM -0200, Juan Berner wrote:
> > 1) Allow NAT clients to be TOR relay nodes (even maybe exit nodes)
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 05:00:38PM -0200, Juan Berner wrote:
> 1) Allow NAT clients to be TOR relay nodes (even maybe exit nodes) , this
> would
> be done using a queue system, possibly in a hidden service but not necessary,
> where nat relay nodes can query what tor clients want to connect to the
Hi,
Im wondering if you have considered this, I haven't seen it anywhere:
1) Allow NAT clients to be TOR relay nodes (even maybe exit nodes) , this
would be done using a queue system, possibly in a hidden service but not
necessary, where nat relay nodes can query what tor clients want to connect
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 05:30:27PM +0100, Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 01:40:43AM +, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> > obfs3 is supposed to be fairly difficult to detect because entropy
> > estimation is seemingly more difficult than typically assumed,
> > and thus far from what has
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 01:40:43AM +, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> obfs3 is supposed to be fairly difficult to detect because entropy
> estimation is seemingly more difficult than typically assumed,
> and thus far from what has been seen in practice this seems to be true.
There's a recent paper whi
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 08:30:12AM -0500, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 01:40:43AM +, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> > obfs3 is supposed to be fairly difficult to detect because entropy
> > estimation is seemingly more difficult than typically assumed,
> > and thus far from what has be
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:01:13PM -0600, Nicholas Hopper wrote:
> > Yes: Nick (who would probably be the one writing the code anyway)
> > generates the shares encrypted to keys generated by the authority
> > operators, sends them to the authority operators, and forgets the
> > intermediate results
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 01:40:43AM +, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> obfs3 is supposed to be fairly difficult to detect because entropy
> estimation is seemingly more difficult than typically assumed,
> and thus far from what has been seen in practice this seems to be true.
Wouldn't the way to detect
Hi devs,
we're going to have an IRC meeting to discuss next steps for the Weather
rewrite:
Wednesday, January 22, at 18:00 UTC in #tor-dev on OFTC.
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20140122T18
Everyone's invited to join the discussion. Abhiram, Norbert, and
Oliver, wh
15 matches
Mail list logo
