On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:52:03AM +0100, Nicolas Vigier wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, isis agora lovecruft wrote:
>
> > Nicolas Vigier transcribed 1.4K bytes:
Hi Nicolas!
Thanks again for following up on this!
> >
> > Just in case you haven't seen it, Lunar made a wiki page which has quite a
I've been thinking about a couple of tricky use cases for pluggable
transport libraries, and whether we should do anything to try to support
them.
The first use case is the flashproxy/websocket use case.
flashproxy-client recognizes the two transport names "flashproxy" and
"websocket" as synonyms.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:57 PM, coderman wrote:
> hello all, Nick,
>
> per the other thread in tor-talk about RDRAND, this is the minor fix
> for OpenSSL 1.0.1+ mentioned.
>
> i don't know that this is useful, and i am still giving the engine
> code a thorough review per Nick's other feedback: "
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, isis agora lovecruft wrote:
> Nicolas Vigier transcribed 1.4K bytes:
> > Hi,
>
> Hey Nicolas,
>
> Thanks for all the work you're doing, and my apologies that I hadn't responded
> to your tor-dev@ call yet.
Hi Isis, thanks for your answer.
>
> Just in case you haven't seen
i was able to confirm the expected behavior using the BADRAND engine
attached to same ticket:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/10402
and also here (do trac tickets ever go away / get deleted?):
https://peertech.org/dist/openssl-1.0.1e-badrand-test.patch
currently Tor on 1.0.1+
hello all, Nick,
per the other thread in tor-talk about RDRAND, this is the minor fix
for OpenSSL 1.0.1+ mentioned.
i don't know that this is useful, and i am still giving the engine
code a thorough review per Nick's other feedback: "Above all, do not
assume
that you understand how OpenSSL works
> Last, but certainly not least, I have a couple of things in mind that we
> might like in the *future*. It would be good to know which of these
> things sound interesting to others, so I can direct my time on the most
> popular features first:
Hi Karsten. I'm definitely a fan of #1. Also, it's n
On Dec 18, 2013, at 4:51 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Hi Rob, Florian,
>
> thanks for your replies! If you say these statistics may still be
> useful, then let's leave them in!
>
Great!
> I just worked on a slightly better visualization of the available data.
> The idea is that the most inte
Hi Rob, Florian,
thanks for your replies! If you say these statistics may still be
useful, then let's leave them in!
I just worked on a slightly better visualization of the available data.
The idea is that the most interesting piece of information, AIUI, is
what fraction of connections is used
