David Goulet:
> Ok, I manage to make it work with Firefox.
Yeah! :)
> However, and a BIG however, this is a special fix for specific case
> where memory allocation is handle by the application AND syscall() is
> used. It will not cover the broader issue of using other syscall within
> a malloc ho
On 9/6/13 3:58 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> I just finished a first draft of a tech report sketching out the
> requirements and a software design for a new Torperf implementation.
Sathya, Kevin, and I improved this tech report draft a lot and finally
published it today:
https://research.torprojec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear List,
I have been trying to help get Project Cute which is a "point-and-click"
hidden service blogging tool, off the ground.
So far I have 2 documents that have come out as a result of a few IRC chats.
1) Possible use-cases:
https://trac.tor
On 30 Oct (12:28:19), Lunar wrote:
> Lunar:
> > David Goulet:
> > > Now the issue was detected with firefox which uses a custom malloc hook
> > > meaning that it handles its own memory allocation. This hook uses mmap()
> > > that firefox redefines to be a direct syscall(__NR_mmap, ...) and
> > > re
dardok writes:
> Hi, I am quite new in here but I am interested to help and improve the
> TOR system. I am interested in PTs and particularly in developing a
> HTTP PT.
>
> I've read some papers [0],[1],[2],[3] and the ticket #8676 and I
> consider that it would be a good idea to make an effort a
Hi tor devs,
Steven, Rob, and I wrote a tech report on evaluating Steven's libutp Tor
implementation in the public Tor network and using Chutney and Shadow:
https://research.torproject.org/techreports/libutp-2013-10-30.pdf
>From the introduction:
"""
Datagram designs are a promising approach to
Lunar:
> David Goulet:
> > Now the issue was detected with firefox which uses a custom malloc hook
> > meaning that it handles its own memory allocation. This hook uses mmap()
> > that firefox redefines to be a direct syscall(__NR_mmap, ...) and
> > remember that this symbol is hijacked by torsocks
On 10/29/2013 07:30 PM, Tom Lowenthal wrote:
> Any questions or suggestions?
>
> -Tom
Is this a "tor dev" thing, or a "devs who work on tor-related projects
but who are not part of tor" thing?
~Griffin
--
"Cypherpunks write code not flame wars." --Jurre van Bergen
#Foucault / PGP: 0xAE792C97
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:30:24AM -0700, Tom Lowenthal wrote:
> When applying for grants, planning future work, and otherwise thinking
> about what capacity we have leftover to do things in the future, it's
> really useful to know who's doing what and how much of it. I get some
> of this informati
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:49:46PM +, George Kadianakis wrote:
> Christopher Baines writes:
>
> > On 28/10/13 13:19, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> >> This is a proposal I wrote to implement scalable hidden services. It's
> >> by no means finished (there are some slight inconsistencies which I will
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:40:12PM +, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 28/10/13 13:19, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> > This is a proposal I wrote to implement scalable hidden services. It's
> > by no means finished (there are some slight inconsistencies which I will
> > be correcting later today or tom
11 matches
Mail list logo
