> Executing scripts and reading stdout/stderr is probably too low-level.
> I think we need a Python/Twisted (or whatever language Torperf will be
> written in) interface for running an experiment and retrieving results.
>
> You're probably right on stdout/err being too low level, but most
experimen
Leo Unglaub ha scritto:
> Hey,
>
> On 2013-09-17 03:51, Liste wrote:
>
>> Work complete for the version 0.0.0Beta
>>
>> http://anopticon.ws/13c03c09/OnionMail-0.0.0.B.zip
>>
>
> please can you upload the source code as well, because no one is going
> to execute a .jar file without knowing t
Hey,
On 2013-09-17 03:51, Liste wrote:
> Work complete for the version 0.0.0Beta
>
> http://anopticon.ws/13c03c09/OnionMail-0.0.0.B.zip
please can you upload the source code as well, because no one is going
to execute a .jar file without knowing the program code.
Thanks and greetings
Leo
--
L
Was there a discussion about the 'cables-communication'
approach from Liberte-Linux in the mailing list?
What's the general oppinion here?
Is it trustable/secure/relyable?
best /jo
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.tor
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:53:15AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Here are the three graphs just for September, all ending on the
> same day:
>
> https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html?graph=direct-users&start=2013-09-01&end=2013-09-13&country=all&events=off#direct-users
>
> https://metrics.t
On 9/17/13 6:25 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:53:15AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>> Here are the three graphs just for September, all ending on the
>> same day:
>>
>> https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html?graph=direct-users&start=2013-09-01&end=2013-09-13&country=a
On 9/17/13 3:33 AM, Kevin Butler wrote:
> [cc tor-dev]
>
> On 16 September 2013 09:47, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>
>> Hmm, I don't think the HTTP client/server part is the right interface to
>> write another client and server and call it Torperf compatible. The
>> Torperf data API would be a bette
On 9/17/13 12:02 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:28:21PM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>> Here's the plan:
>>
>> - Compute user numbers for 2012 and before; the current numbers start
>> on January 1, 2013. This is going to take at least until September 23.
>
> Sounds goo
On 9/17/13 8:38 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:02:14PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> I think it would be good to write a paragraph or two to answer Matthew's
>> question -- why are these new numbers different, and what makes us think
>> they're better?
>
> Speaking of
On 9/16/13 11:07 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:28:21 +0200
> Karsten Loesing wrote:
>
>> Why do I tell you this?
>>
>> Because the old approach uses resources on our poor, already
>> overloaded metrics machine, and I'm planning to shut down the old
>> approach in the very near
On 9/16/13 10:55 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> Awesome work with these metrics. I am curious, however, why the new
> metrics are more correct than the old ones. The graphs are definitely
> smoother and including the requests to the Dir Auths seems correct,
> but are there other specific reasons for t
On 9/16/13 8:36 PM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> I would actually really appreciate the old numbers (from ~2007-8/2013)
> being kept online. Estimating growth over time and mapping spikes is
> kind of a big deal to me. =)
I see. How about I put the CSV files for direct and bridge users,
estimated wi
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:02:14PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> I think it would be good to write a paragraph or two to answer Matthew's
> question -- why are these new numbers different, and what makes us think
> they're better?
Speaking of which:
https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html#dir
13 matches
Mail list logo
