Hello all,
I didn't get much review on my first draft due to recent craziness and
people being generally busy, but I've been slowly poking at LODP as time
allows. I've went and made some modifications to the initial draft that
I posted to tor-dev@, and made some tentative steps towards writing th
Hello pluggable transport devs,
As there was no objection to the proposed time, we are going to have our
first one today/tomorrow:
Friday - Sept 13
CEST: 18:00
BST (Summer GMT): 17:00
UTC: 16:00
EST: 12:00
MNT: 10:00
PST: 9:00
@ #tor-dev on irc.oftc.net
And stick to it in future. The format wil
I thought we were having it at noon EST tomorrow. If no one else
shows up, maybe we can have a discussion about cats or something. (Or
just show up in #tor-dev and start talking about pluggable transports
until it turns into a meeting ;-) )
~Griffin
Kevin P Dyer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Will we b
Hi David,
On 12/09/13 11:57 PM, David Goulet wrote:
> Hi Luke!
>
> Luke Gallagher:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I would like to make sure I'm heading in the right direction with
>> the tests and have a few questions which I've compiled below:
>>
>>
>> First of all generally speaking:
>>
>> I've taken t
Hi all,
Will we be having the first Pluggable Transport Weekly tomorrow?
I'm working towards getting a build environment setup for the PTTBB and
would like to chat about it, to ensure I'm not duplicating previous efforts.
Thanks,
Kevin
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Vmon wrote:
> I sent thi
Hey Jeroen,
Thanks for your feedback, please see inline.
On 12 September 2013 09:03, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2013-09-12 09:25 , Kevin Butler wrote:
>
> [generic 203 proposal (and similar http scheme) comments]
>
> - HTTPS requires certificates, self-signed ones can easily be blocked
>as
Hi Luke!
Luke Gallagher:
> Hi David,
>
> I would like to make sure I'm heading in the right direction with the
> tests and have a few questions which I've compiled below:
>
>
> First of all generally speaking:
>
> I've taken the approach: if a declaration is defined in the header file
> then I
On 2013-09-12 09:25 , Kevin Butler wrote:
[generic 203 proposal (and similar http scheme) comments]
- HTTPS requires certificates, self-signed ones can easily be blocked
as they are self-signed and thus likely not important.
If the certs are all 'similar' (same CA, formatting etc) they can
(This email got way out of hand from a basic 'I'll bounce an idea here',
here's to hoping I haven't made some huge oversight.)
I've been thinking about the https frontend after reading the basic problem
when I started looking into Tor dev but never took the time to read the
actual proposal. When I
