On 2013-09-10 05:34, George Kadianakis wrote:
> BTW, posting here two more PT-rate-limiting ideas (instead of the
> currently proposed RATE_LIMIT command) proposed by Andreas and Lunar
> in IRC:
>
> * PTs calculate their overhead and send a "fudge factor" to Tor when
> they start up (for example
Andreas Krey writes:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:17:12 +, George Kadianakis wrote:
>> Hey Yawning (and tor-dev),
>>
>> a topic that we will soon need to consider seriously is rate limiting
>> of pluggable transports. For example, Obfsproxy at the moment does not
>> understand rate limiting and
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:17:12 +, George Kadianakis wrote:
> Hey Yawning (and tor-dev),
>
> a topic that we will soon need to consider seriously is rate limiting
> of pluggable transports. For example, Obfsproxy at the moment does not
> understand rate limiting and will happily read and write as
Hey Yawning (and tor-dev),
a topic that we will soon need to consider seriously is rate limiting
of pluggable transports. For example, Obfsproxy at the moment does not
understand rate limiting and will happily read and write as many bytes
as needed.
After some discussions in IRC and #3587, we dec
On 9/7/13 5:57 PM, Charlie Belmer wrote:
> Hey Karsten & Dev team,
>
> I didn't mean to take this off channel, so my apologies for that.
>
> I ran a few more tests this week (and my apologies on the slowness of some
> of this work - life has been hectic this past month), but I am not finding
> mu
