Hi,
my name is EPTO. I am the founder of Anopticon Project and tramaci.org
http://tramaci.org/anopticon (Map of Video surveillance cameras)
http://tramaci.org
(This lists...@tramacci.org is my mail address for mailinglists).
I'm building a new project: A mail server for the tor netword to
increase
Karsten Loesing:
> Feedback in the form of patches to the LaTeX sources is most preferred,
> though email replies are of course fine, too.
See attachments.
--
Lunar
From 22fed7b7155481904cb92136f9d04777fad72fde Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lunar
Da
Hi *,
In the past two weeks, I've been working on EvilGenius. I had some weird
problems with vagrant, and in the meantime I switched to Debian, but
that is another story.
I spent most of my GSoC-time on some seriously weird routing issues, one
of which I eventually solved today. I am confident th
libtorsocks(): Need a password in torsocks.conf or
$TORSOCKS_PASSWORD to authenticate with ...
: Connection refused
To use default torsocks 1.3 you'll need to set socksport
noisolatesocksauth or prefersocksnoauth
or perhaps configure a user:pass in torsocks beyond the
unset default, as hinted a
(This would have probably been better asked on tor-relays@.)
Leo Unglaub:
> to fix the load issues on my 5 relays i tryed the suggested development
> version of tor. But there is not difference at all on the exit relays.
> They all burn on 99% CPU usage at 23 MB/s bandwidth.
>
> Is there somethin
Hey guys,
to fix the load issues on my 5 relays i tryed the suggested development
version of tor. But there is not difference at all on the exit relays.
They all burn on 99% CPU usage at 23 MB/s bandwidth.
Is there something special i have to do in the config to benefit from
the new changes mad to
> An experiment making these more realistic measurements should use
> -something like Selenium/Firefox to control an actual browser to make
> +something like Selenium to control an actual Tor Browser to make
> requests.
FYI, I have written code that downloads the present Tor Browser alpha
and Pyth
> From: Yawning Angel
>
> Assuming not today (2013/09/16) isn't "soon", the times specified works
> for me and I will make an effort to attend.
>
No, I didn't mean today. I just wanted to send it as soon as found out
it hasn't been out. Perhapse it was better to wait few hours. But I
would like to
Hi,
Thanks for writing this Karsten!
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I just finished a first draft of a tech report sketching out the
> requirements and a software design for a new Torperf implementation.
>
> This is related to my earlier attempt to rewr
Hi everyone,
I just finished a first draft of a tech report sketching out the
requirements and a software design for a new Torperf implementation.
This is related to my earlier attempt to rewrite Torperf in Twisted [0],
which I still think is a good idea, but only if somebody else who's
better at
That day and time work well for me -- thanks for setting this up! =)
~Griffin
On 09/06/2013 04:58 AM, Vmon wrote:
> I sent this email quite a while ago and I was surprised that nobody
> was interested/replied. Today I found out that I had sent it to a
> wrong address. But here we are, so I'm send
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 02:58:55AM -0600, Vmon wrote:
> CEST: 18:00
> BST (Summer GMT): 17:00
> EST: 12:00
> MNT: 10:00
> PST: 9:00
That's OK for me. Thanks for organising this, vmon.
Cheers,
Philipp
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.or
On 06/09/13 09:58, Vmon wrote:
> Preliminary, we decided to have the meeting on Fridays, cause why not,
> but if you have serious problem with Fridays then we might be able to
> pick a better day.
>
> For the time of the meeting, considering the geographical positions
> of the current transport de
On 2013-09-06 01:58, Vmon wrote:
> I sent this email quite a while ago and I was surprised that nobody was
> interested/replied. Today I found out that I had sent it to a wrong
> address. But here we are, so I'm sending it again. So please reply so we
> can kick this off soon.
Assuming not today (
I sent this email quite a while ago and I was surprised that nobody was
interested/replied. Today I found out that I had sent it to a wrong
address. But here we are, so I'm sending it again. So please reply so we
can kick this off soon.
Thanks,
Vmon
-- Forwarded message --
From:
15 matches
Mail list logo