[tor-dev] I have a project that might interest you. OnionMail

2013-09-06 Thread Liste
Hi, my name is EPTO. I am the founder of Anopticon Project and tramaci.org http://tramaci.org/anopticon (Map of Video surveillance cameras) http://tramaci.org (This lists...@tramacci.org is my mail address for mailinglists). I'm building a new project: A mail server for the tor netword to increase

Re: [tor-dev] First draft of Requirements and Software Design for a Better Tor Performance Measurement Tool

2013-09-06 Thread Lunar
Karsten Loesing: > Feedback in the form of patches to the LaTeX sources is most preferred, > though email replies are of course fine, too. See attachments. -- Lunar From 22fed7b7155481904cb92136f9d04777fad72fde Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lunar Da

[tor-dev] GSoC Status Report - EvilGenius

2013-09-06 Thread Johannes Fürmann
Hi *, In the past two weeks, I've been working on EvilGenius. I had some weird problems with vagrant, and in the meantime I switched to Debian, but that is another story. I spent most of my GSoC-time on some seriously weird routing issues, one of which I eventually solved today. I am confident th

[tor-dev] torsocks: 0.2.4.17 socksport isolate auth

2013-09-06 Thread grarpamp
libtorsocks(): Need a password in torsocks.conf or $TORSOCKS_PASSWORD to authenticate with ... : Connection refused To use default torsocks 1.3 you'll need to set socksport noisolatesocksauth or prefersocksnoauth or perhaps configure a user:pass in torsocks beyond the unset default, as hinted a

Re: [tor-dev] High load even with 0.2.4.17-rc

2013-09-06 Thread Lunar
(This would have probably been better asked on tor-relays@.) Leo Unglaub: > to fix the load issues on my 5 relays i tryed the suggested development > version of tor. But there is not difference at all on the exit relays. > They all burn on 99% CPU usage at 23 MB/s bandwidth. > > Is there somethin

[tor-dev] High load even with 0.2.4.17-rc

2013-09-06 Thread Leo Unglaub
Hey guys, to fix the load issues on my 5 relays i tryed the suggested development version of tor. But there is not difference at all on the exit relays. They all burn on 99% CPU usage at 23 MB/s bandwidth. Is there something special i have to do in the config to benefit from the new changes mad to

Re: [tor-dev] First draft of Requirements and Software Design for a Better Tor Performance Measurement Tool

2013-09-06 Thread Zack Weinberg
> An experiment making these more realistic measurements should use > -something like Selenium/Firefox to control an actual browser to make > +something like Selenium to control an actual Tor Browser to make > requests. FYI, I have written code that downloads the present Tor Browser alpha and Pyth

Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable transport weekly meeting

2013-09-06 Thread vmonmoonshine
> From: Yawning Angel > > Assuming not today (2013/09/16) isn't "soon", the times specified works > for me and I will make an effort to attend. > No, I didn't mean today. I just wanted to send it as soon as found out it hasn't been out. Perhapse it was better to wait few hours. But I would like to

Re: [tor-dev] First draft of Requirements and Software Design for a Better Tor Performance Measurement Tool

2013-09-06 Thread Sathyanarayanan Gunasekaran
Hi, Thanks for writing this Karsten! On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I just finished a first draft of a tech report sketching out the > requirements and a software design for a new Torperf implementation. > > This is related to my earlier attempt to rewr

[tor-dev] First draft of Requirements and Software Design for a Better Tor Performance Measurement Tool

2013-09-06 Thread Karsten Loesing
Hi everyone, I just finished a first draft of a tech report sketching out the requirements and a software design for a new Torperf implementation. This is related to my earlier attempt to rewrite Torperf in Twisted [0], which I still think is a good idea, but only if somebody else who's better at

Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable transport weekly meeting

2013-09-06 Thread Griffin Boyce
That day and time work well for me -- thanks for setting this up! =) ~Griffin On 09/06/2013 04:58 AM, Vmon wrote: > I sent this email quite a while ago and I was surprised that nobody > was interested/replied. Today I found out that I had sent it to a > wrong address. But here we are, so I'm send

Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable transport weekly meeting

2013-09-06 Thread Philipp Winter
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 02:58:55AM -0600, Vmon wrote: > CEST: 18:00 > BST (Summer GMT): 17:00 > EST: 12:00 > MNT: 10:00 > PST: 9:00 That's OK for me. Thanks for organising this, vmon. Cheers, Philipp ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.or

Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable transport weekly meeting

2013-09-06 Thread Ximin Luo
On 06/09/13 09:58, Vmon wrote: > Preliminary, we decided to have the meeting on Fridays, cause why not, > but if you have serious problem with Fridays then we might be able to > pick a better day. > > For the time of the meeting, considering the geographical positions > of the current transport de

Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable transport weekly meeting

2013-09-06 Thread Yawning Angel
On 2013-09-06 01:58, Vmon wrote: > I sent this email quite a while ago and I was surprised that nobody was > interested/replied. Today I found out that I had sent it to a wrong > address. But here we are, so I'm sending it again. So please reply so we > can kick this off soon. Assuming not today (

[tor-dev] Pluggable transport weekly meeting

2013-09-06 Thread Vmon
I sent this email quite a while ago and I was surprised that nobody was interested/replied. Today I found out that I had sent it to a wrong address. But here we are, so I'm sending it again. So please reply so we can kick this off soon. Thanks, Vmon -- Forwarded message -- From: