> proposal, I guess, by having documents signed with Ed25519 and
> RSA1024... but one of the signatures is much better than the other:
> 255-bit ECC groups will be secure long after RSA1024 has fallen.
I think the reference I saw was referring not to extended effective key
length [1] but to offset
On 8/13/13 3:17 PM, Kostas Jakeliunas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Karsten Loesing
> wrote:
>>
>> I suggest putting pg_prewarm on the future work list. I sense there's a
>> lot of unused potential in stock PostgreSQL. Tweaking the database at
>> this point has the word "premature op
On 8/13/13 10:43 PM, Christian wrote:
> On 13.08.2013 09:20, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>> On 8/12/13 10:56 PM, Christian wrote:
>>> I've seen that you've included the field parameter to limit the fields
>>> that onionoo returns.
>>> Do you think it would be better to use the field parameter and show a