-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi *, hi Arturo,
Thank you for the introduction. My name is Johannes and I will be
working on a vagrant-based solution for internet censorship simulation.
With vagrant being a powerful but easy-to-use tool, I expect to make
some progress really soon.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As suggested by Tor Project's helpdesk, I'm forwarding this message to
tor-dev, in hopes that I might be able to evoke any useful references,
suggestions or commentary.
- -- Forwarded message --
From: Matt Pagan via RT
Date: Fri, Jun
>> >> This has the side effect of promoting good onion upkeep.
>>
>> Which people might be loathe to do given the recent paper
>> about deanon hidden services seeming to be relatively doable.
>> At least until those issues are solved...
>>
>> > of the system. After 6 months (or so) the naming will
On 6/7/13 2:37 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
(Sorry for cross-posting, but I think this is a topic for tor-dev@, not
tor-talk@. If you agree, please reply on tor-dev@ only. tor-talk@
people can follow the thread here:
OK, following up on tor-dev. I thought tor-dev might be the more
appropria
Hello everyone!
During this year's Google Summer of Code I[0] will be working on reducing the
Round-Trip-Time (RTT) for preemptively built circuits.[1] My mentors are Mike
and Aaron.
A brief summary of the project:
RTTs of circuits can be measured by violating the exit policy of the exit node
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 02:23:55AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> >> This has the side effect of promoting good onion upkeep.
>
> Which people might be loathe to do given the recent paper
> about deanon hidden services seeming to be relatively doable.
> At least until those issues are solved...
>
> > o
On Jun 6, 2013 9:56 AM, "Matthew Finkel" wrote:
> I suppose the followup question to this is "is there really a need for
> backwards compatability n years in the future?" I completely understand
> the usefulness of this feature but I'm unsure if maintaining this
> ability is really necessary. The
