Hello,
I receive a daily digest, so I am replying to everything at once.
> http, https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/HEAD:/dir-spec.txt
>
> section 1 line 184 "All directory information is uploaded and
> downloaded with HTTP."
>
> If you search through the document for http, you will fi
On 17 May 2013 09:23, George Kadianakis wrote:
> There are basically two ways to do this:
>
A third comes to mind, somewhat similar to Mike's.
If we believe that 1024 RSA is not broken *now* (or at the very least, if
it is broken it's too valuable to waste on breaking Tor's Hidden
Services...)
Matthew Finkel wrote:
> So I think we should make some terms clear (just for the sake of
> clarity). We have, I guess, three different naming-system ideas
> floating here: petnames, (distibuted) namecoin-ish, and centralized
> consensus-based - rough summary.
>
> Some months ago, the petname syst
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 02:40:13PM -0400, Jon Smithe wrote:
> I have been reading through the various tor specifications trying to
> understand how this all works, so please forgive any ignorance of the
> protocol on my part. There seems to be a fair amount of gaps about
> specifically how various
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> On what platform did you test it where you expect it to work? How about
> other platforms where it shouldn't work but also shouldn't do harm?
Actually it looks some sd-daemon.c header includes can cause problems
on Windows, particularly ,
Hi!
Thanks for the comments. Sorry if my reply is long-winded, but you
left me no other choice. :)
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> Could you open a ticket on trac?
Done: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8908
> It seems to me that this requires a bit of
> but not what communication protocol is actually being used.
http, https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/HEAD:/dir-spec.txt
section 1 line 184 "All directory information is uploaded and
downloaded with HTTP."
If you search through the document for http, you will find most of the
uris a
Hello!
I have been reading through the various tor specifications trying to
understand how this all works, so please forgive any ignorance of the
protocol on my part. There seems to be a fair amount of gaps about
specifically how various communications take place; for instance if we
consider the v
I liked the new subject, so I'm sticking with it. :)
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 04:37:22AM -0700, George Kadianakis wrote:
> > adrelanos:
> >> George Kadianakis:
> >> I don't know if the petname system is an completely orthogonal issue or
> >> if it could be considered when you decide this one.
> >>
Marti Raudsepp:
> Hi list,
>
> The attached patch implements support for systemd socket activation.
>
> For people who don't know what that is: systemd is an "init" system
> for Linux. Socket activation means that systemd binds all the sockets
> in advance, and only spawns Tor once somebody attem
Hi list,
The attached patch implements support for systemd socket activation.
For people who don't know what that is: systemd is an "init" system
for Linux. Socket activation means that systemd binds all the sockets
in advance, and only spawns Tor once somebody attempts to connect.
More informat
> adrelanos:
>> George Kadianakis:
>> > If we move to the higher security of (e.g.) 128-bits, the base32
>> string
>> > suddenly becomes 26 characters. Is that still conveniently sized to
>> pass
>> > around, or should we admit that we failed this goal and we are free to
>> > crank up the security
12 matches
Mail list logo
