> George Kadianakis:
>> we have decided to keep the Obfsproxy name and simply replace the old C
>> codebase with the new Python codebase. It seems that 'obfsproxy' is an
>> extremely powerful brand name and changing it will result in user
>> confusion.
>>
>> That said, what is the best way to updat
Hey,
On 2013-03-22 17:12, Damian Johnson wrote:
> (just supporting 2.6 and higher, including the 3.x series)
it's fine with me. My "vidalia rewrite" Gibbs is 3.x only so i have no
problem with dropping the 2.5 support.
Greetings
Leo
--
Leo Unglaub
Nachreihengasse 39 / Top 7
A-1170 Vienna
Austr
Hi all. Will anyone be sad if I drop python 2.5 support from stem
(just supporting 2.6 and higher, including the 3.x series)? If all
goes well stem will be having its first release this next weekend and
my thinking is this...
* Python itself considers python 2.5 to be obsolete, having dropped
docs
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> George Kadianakis:
> > That said, what is the best way to update the Debian packages so that they
> > contain the Python codebase?
>
> obfsproxy will be in Wheezy. So in any cases, if the binary package name
> is going to stay the same, it would probabl
George Kadianakis:
> we have decided to keep the Obfsproxy name and simply replace the old C
> codebase with the new Python codebase. It seems that 'obfsproxy' is an
> extremely powerful brand name and changing it will result in user
> confusion.
>
> That said, what is the best way to update the De
