I think if it become as good as Vidalia and better, that would be most
welcome.
Questions are:
* What is missing in Vidalia?
* Why has development of Vidalia stopped?
* Time to switch to python?
* Time for a rewrite or better improve the existing code base?
Before developing it, I'd make a list
> So i started to rewrite it from scratch and i am close to the release of
> the source code.
That would be... quite a substantial project. Kamran Khan, a GSoC
student from a couple years back, did a GTK controller in python. What
language did you use? How long have you been working on this, and b
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Leo Unglaub wrote:
> Hey friends,
> i want to inform you that i am working on a complete new control tool
> for Tor. I know some people use Vidalia for it, but i never liked the
> program and the people i showed vidalia often got confused.
It sounds like a cool pr
This sounds really cool. I've found in my user studies that Vidalia can
be confusing to users (since Vidalia and the TBB are two different
application windows)
Is that an issue you're trying to solve in your rewrite?
(Reference, if you want some background:
http://petsymposium.org/2012/papers/ho
Hey friends,
i want to inform you that i am working on a complete new control tool
for Tor. I know some people use Vidalia for it, but i never liked the
program and the people i showed vidalia often got confused.
So i started to rewrite it from scratch and i am close to the release of
the source c
Gotcha. I'd still advise against it. Controllers can certainly parse
that kind of response, but it sucks for users. Stem's ORCONN event
handling is suckier than most because of it.
https://gitweb.torproject.org/stem.git/blob/HEAD:/stem/response/events.py#l631
__
On 2/20/13 5:13 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
>> In general, I agree. Here, I re-used the code that adds a LongName or
>> Target to CIRC events. It's a single function call that returns the
>> best information tor has about the remote end of a connection.
>
> I'm not sure that I follow. Do you mean
> In general, I agree. Here, I re-used the code that adds a LongName or
> Target to CIRC events. It's a single function call that returns the
> best information tor has about the remote end of a connection.
I'm not sure that I follow. Do you mean the Path attribute of CIRC
events? If so then tha
Micah Lee:
> On 02/19/2013 06:39 PM, adrelanos wrote:
>>> What operating system are you using?
>>
>> Debian Wheezy.
>
> Weird, that's what I'm running Wheezy too. But just to be safe, I
> decided I'd make a new Debian Squeeze vm and try to build it and run it
> in there. I found several small prob
