Re: [tor-dev] final torsocks RC 1.3 tar.gz up for testing

2013-01-30 Thread grarpamp
> Do you have the compiler output from RELENG_4? make all-recursive Making all in src source='torsocks.c' object='torsocks.lo' libtool=yes DEPDIR=.deps depmode=gcc /bin/sh ../depcomp /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -g -O2 -Wall -c -o torsocks.lo tor

Re: [tor-dev] [tor-talk] Exit Node Scanning Status

2013-01-30 Thread AntiTree
Stem seems like a good choice and something I've been meaning to get back in to. I've been using the old Python library. I'd be happy to work on this project and get up to speed with what Mike wrote a while back. I've got to go through the old SOAT code, but can anyone tell me a structural reason n

Re: [tor-dev] [tor-talk] Exit Node Scanning Status

2013-01-30 Thread Damian Johnson
> Actually, I might be a good fit. Feel free to ping me off-list to discuss. Unless there's a reason that you'd like to make this private it's better to have development discussions in the open (though tor-dev@ is probably more appropriate). Imho writing a SoaT counterpart based on either stem [1]

Re: [tor-dev] Comments on librarifying an Extended ORPort client?

2013-01-30 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:02 PM, George Kadianakis wrote: > Hi Nick, Hi, George! [...] > Unfortunately, I don't know how to do such a thing without influencing > a certain networking programming style to the transport author. For > example, if I coded the Extended ORPort client in Twisted, the

Re: [tor-dev] All the problems about Stegotorous

2013-01-30 Thread George Kadianakis
vmonmoonsh...@gmail.com writes: > I summed up the discussion plus what I had in mind with in 15 tickets > that I put on the track. > > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=needs_information&status=needs_review&status=needs_revision&status=new&status

Re: [tor-dev] final torsocks RC 1.3 tar.gz up for testing

2013-01-30 Thread Matthew Finkel
On Jan 29, 2013 10:11 PM, "grarpamp" wrote: > > > Thus, I am declaring the following tar.gz to be the final RC for 1.3: > > Though I don't actually use it on FreeBSD RELENG_4 anymore, > it doesn't compile there. If someone has old routers or something > based on that they should speak up. Do you

Re: [tor-dev] All the problems about Stegotorous

2013-01-30 Thread vmonmoonshine
I summed up the discussion plus what I had in mind with in 15 tickets that I put on the track. https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=needs_information&status=needs_review&status=needs_revision&status=new&status=reopened&component=Stegotorus&order=pri