On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:12:10AM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Hi! Here are some initial thoughts:
>
> * If we're going to do it like this, maybe we need to make cell_t
> packed or something eventually. It's got a fair amount of padding
> overhead right now.
Yeah - but relay_crypt() wants a
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
> Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@freehaven.net):
>
>> Title: Improved circuit-creation key exchange
>> Author: Nick Mathewson
>>
>> Summary:
>>
>> This is an attempt to translate the proposed circuit handshake from
>> "Anonymity and one-wa
Thus spake Watson Ladd (watsonbl...@gmail.com):
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
> >
> > Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@freehaven.net):
> >
> > > Title: Improved circuit-creation key exchange
> > > Author: Nick Mathewson
> > >
> > > Summary:
> > >
> > > This is an attemp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi everyone,
This is quite interesting. I wrote back an initial proposal for this
kind of work in Tor and I'm happy to see some similarities :).
I've attached to the email the ideas I had based on some discussions
with Nick and reading the ticket #
On Nov 29, 2012 9:30 PM, "Andrea Shepard" wrote:
>
> Please review first draft proposed parallel relaycrypt structures
> in my parallel_relay_crypt branch.
>
Hi! Here are some initial thoughts:
* If we're going to do it like this, maybe we need to make cell_t
packed or something eventually. I
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
>
> Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@freehaven.net):
>
> > Title: Improved circuit-creation key exchange
> > Author: Nick Mathewson
> >
> > Summary:
> >
> > This is an attempt to translate the proposed circuit handshake from
> > "Anonymity a
