Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 216: Improved circuit-creation key exchange

2012-11-29 Thread Mike Perry
Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@freehaven.net): > Title: Improved circuit-creation key exchange > Author: Nick Mathewson > > Summary: > > This is an attempt to translate the proposed circuit handshake from > "Anonymity and one-way authentication in key-exchange protocols" by > Goldberg,

[tor-dev] Parallel relaycrypt data structures for review

2012-11-29 Thread Andrea Shepard
Please review first draft proposed parallel relaycrypt structures in my parallel_relay_crypt branch. -- Andrea Shepard PGP fingerprint: 3611 95A4 0740 ED1B 7EA5 DF7E 4191 13D9 D0CF BDA5 pgpNKJ9L81i7A.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ tor-dev mailin

Re: [tor-dev] questions about extending circuit

2012-11-29 Thread Damian Johnson
Hi. Both HackerSpaceSeoul and HackerspaceSeoul lack the named flag, which likely is why tor isn't allowing you to refer to it by the nickname. Have you tried referring to it by the fingerprint instead? Speaking of which, TorCtl is being deprecated in favor of a couple newer controller libraries...

[tor-dev] questions about extending circuit

2012-11-29 Thread succer...@tiscali.it
Hi all, I need to create specific circuit, specifying the exit route. I've already found http://www.thesprawl.org/research/tor-control-protocol/ but this explain how to create circuit with nickames.Suddenly, nickname are not univoque and i think tor have problem creating circuit when the nicknam

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 205: Remove global client-side DNS caching

2012-11-29 Thread Julian Yon
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:53:03 -0500 Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Julian Yon > wrote: > > > > So, perhaps have a cache but only consult it for making decisions > > about whether to use a circuit, not for resolving client requests? > > Although this is still vulnerable