On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 01:50:47PM -0400, Robert Ransom wrote:
> > 18:04 <+eleitl> I wonder why they didn't choose UDP
>
> Presumably because TCP was easier.
Yep.
> > 18:05 <@cjd> you need to fall back on tcp in case you're firewalled to hell
> > 18:05 <+eleitl> Apparently, they're thinking abou
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 01:50:47PM -0400, Robert Ransom wrote:
> The v3 network consensus document must be signed by a majority of the
> (currently nine) directory authorities' signing keys. None of the
Nice.
> directory authorities are operated by Tor Project, Inc..
Is there a documented proc
Hi,
I want to make the tor browser with certain size, eg. 650*650, so as to
do some test on some webpages
I used command line like:
App/Firefox/firefox --profile Data/profile -height 650 -width 650
but it doesn't work
I tried to modify localstore.rdf in Data/profile, but it i
On 10/4/12, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> I've had an IRC session with the designer of cjdns (on cjdns)
> who made a few interesting points, and suggestions. Comments?
>
> Verbatim chat snip below.
>
> 18:03 <@cjd> if you took the components from cjdns, you could build a TOR
> like protocol which used UD
I've had an IRC session with the designer of cjdns (on cjdns)
who made a few interesting points, and suggestions. Comments?
Verbatim chat snip below.
18:03 <@cjd> if you took the components from cjdns, you could build a TOR like
protocol which used UDP if
possible and made connecti
I've had an IRC session with the designer of cjdns (on cjdns)
who made a few interesting points, and suggestions. Comments?
Verbatim chat snip below.
18:03 <@cjd> if you took the components from cjdns, you could build a TOR like
protocol which used UDP if
possible and made connecti
Hi all. As is often the case work and such meant not too much time for
tor. For September all I have to report is...
* Network Status Document Parsing
This has been my main focus for September and it's still not
finished... but it's close! Version 3 document parsing just has a
couple days of work
