Re: [tor-dev] TBB Gentoo ebuild

2012-08-27 Thread julian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/27/2012 08:26 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote: > > Ah, I apologize, I thought having optional runtime deps were > possible. I also agree that is should be obvious but I've learned > to err on the side of caution, if possible. Optional runtime-ONLY dep

Re: [tor-dev] TBB Gentoo ebuild

2012-08-27 Thread Matthew Finkel
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 5:35 PM, julian wrote: > 13 Aug 00:28 Matthew Finkel: >> 4) Given 3), is there a reason Tor is not at least an optional >> RDEPEND for torbrowser via a USE flag (or another way)? > > There are no optional runtime-only dependencies in gentoo, this could > change with GLEP 6

Re: [tor-dev] TBB Gentoo ebuild

2012-08-27 Thread Mansour Moufid
On 2012-08-26, at 5:35 PM, julian wrote: > 12 Aug 22:56 Mansour Moufid: >> Even with webrsync you still have to trust the mirror(s), and then >> the Gentoo release infrastructure... > > Forgive me my bluntness, but how is that different from trusting you? I have nothing to do with Tor. > And th

Re: [tor-dev] Next ten Tor Tech Reports

2012-08-27 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 8/20/12 11:06 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote: > On 8/9/12 8:29 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote: >> On 8/8/12 8:13 PM, Mike Perry wrote: >>> Since HotPETS doesn't count as "publishing" perhaps this should be >>> listed as a tech report: >>> http://fscked.org/talks/TorFlow-HotPETS-final.pdf >> >> [...] >> >>

Re: [tor-dev] Tor on IPv6 roadmap and status page

2012-08-27 Thread Linus Nordberg
Andreas Krey wrote Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:50:11 +0200: | On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:45:47 +, Linus Nordberg wrote: | ... | > The roadmaps/Tor/IPv6 [1] wiki page has been started with the goal of | > communicating the status of the work with Tor on IPv6. | | Hmm, is there any thought of allowing IPv