On 8/9/12 5:28 PM, Norman Danner wrote:
Hi Karsten,
We have a preliminary version of the Pyonionoo front-end at
git://github.com/meganchang/pyonionoo.git
Make sure to look at the database branch. We'd be happy to hear feedback.
Unfortunately, this isn't as far as we wanted to be. A r
On 8/8/12, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Michael Backes, Aniket Kate, and Esfandiar Mohammadi have a paper in
> submission called, "An Efficient Key-Exchange for Onion Routing".
> It's meant to be more CPU-efficient than the proposed "ntor"
> handshake. With permission from Esfandiar, I'm sending a li
Hi Karsten,
We have a preliminary version of the Pyonionoo front-end at
git://github.com/meganchang/pyonionoo.git
Make sure to look at the database branch. We'd be happy to hear feedback.
Unfortunately, this isn't as far as we wanted to be. A run-down of the
main open issues:
* We
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On 8/9/12, Watson Ladd wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Robert Ransom
>> wrote:
>>> On 8/8/12, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>>>
Michael Backes, Aniket Kate, and Esfandiar Mohammadi have a paper in
submission called, "An Efficien
On 8/9/12, Watson Ladd wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Robert Ransom
> wrote:
>> On 8/8/12, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Backes, Aniket Kate, and Esfandiar Mohammadi have a paper in
>>> submission called, "An Efficient Key-Exchange for Onion Routing".
>>> It's meant to be more C
On 8/9/12, aniket kate wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 00:22:59 +
>> From: Robert Ransom
>>
>> On 8/8/12, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Backes, Aniket Kate, and Esfandiar Mohammadi have a paper in
>>> submission called, "An Efficient Key-Exchange for Onion Routing".
>>> It's meant to
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Jordi Espasa Clofent
wrote:
>>
>> Can you see what arguments are being passed to configure, and what
>> configure does with them? Is the freebsd build process passing
>> --with-tcmalloc to the configure script?
>
>
> Sure.
>
> mb# pwd && make showconfig
Hm. Does a
Hi Paul,
On 8/9/12 3:03 PM, Paul Syverson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:29:25AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>> On 8/8/12 8:13 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
>>> Since HotPETS doesn't count as "publishing" perhaps this should be
>>> listed as a tech report:
>>> http://fscked.org/talks/TorFlow-HotPET
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On 8/8/12, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
>> Michael Backes, Aniket Kate, and Esfandiar Mohammadi have a paper in
>> submission called, "An Efficient Key-Exchange for Onion Routing".
>> It's meant to be more CPU-efficient than the proposed "ntor"
>>
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:29:25AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 8/8/12 8:13 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
> >
> > Since HotPETS doesn't count as "publishing" perhaps this should be
> > listed as a tech report:
> > http://fscked.org/talks/TorFlow-HotPETS-final.pdf
>
> I agree. If it c
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 00:22:59 +
> From: Robert Ransom
>
> On 8/8/12, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
>> Michael Backes, Aniket Kate, and Esfandiar Mohammadi have a paper in
>> submission called, "An Efficient Key-Exchange for Onion Routing".
>> It's meant to be more CPU-efficient than the proposed
On 08/09/2012 01:43 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Jordi Espasa Clofent
wrote:
Here is the log:
===> Installing for tor-0.2.2.37
===> tor-0.2.2.37 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.7 - found
===> tor-0.2.2.37 depends on shared library: event-2.0 - fou
12 matches
Mail list logo
