On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 07:06:29PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> I implemented (partial) optimistic data support for Privoxy about a year
> ago. The code hasn't been committed to the official repository due to the
> documentation challenge outlined above.
Fair enough. It turns out it never hurts to
Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 05:29:04PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > > So if only a handful of clients
> > > have upgraded to a TBB that supports it (none does at this time),
> > > they'll stand out. That's why the default is "use the conse
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 05:29:04PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > So if only a handful of clients
> > have upgraded to a TBB that supports it (none does at this time),
> > they'll stand out. That's why the default is "use the consensus value",
> > which is curr
Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 07:03:19PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Nick Mathewson wrote:
> >
> > > IMPLEMENTED IN 0.2.3.x
> >
> > >174 Optimistic Data for Tor: Server Side
> > >181 Optimistic Data for Tor: Client Side
> > >
> > > This one is a performance ha
On 6/19/12 2:30 AM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>>146 Add new flag to reflect long-term stability
>>
>> From time to time we get the idea of having clients ship with a
>> reasonably recent consensus (or a list of directory mirrors),
>> so instead of bootstrapping from one of the auth
On 6/18/12 11:24 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED IN 0.2.3.x
>
>186 Multiple addresses for one OR or bridge
>
> We've implemented this to the extent of letting a bridge have a
> single IPv6 address. Supporting this for regular relays will
> need to wait for 0
