Re: [tor-dev] Stem Testing Mocking Issue

2012-06-12 Thread Damian Johnson
Hi Megan, thanks for the patch! What is an example of a standard library function with a builtin type? I'd like to exercise the use case that has been causing you trouble. This change has a couple issues, for instance it treats anything with the same name as a builtin like a builtin. It also calls

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 188: Bridge Guards and other anti-enumeration defenses

2012-06-12 Thread Rob van der Hoeven
> > I would be pleased to use my *dsl/cable home-router with fixed-IP > > address to do a port-mapping to a known and stable tor-relay. > > > > Being able to "setup a bridge" by simply: > > - opening a port-forward on my router > > - submitting it to a web-interface > > > > would be a very cool w

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 188: Bridge Guards and other anti-enumeration defenses

2012-06-12 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:55:24PM +0200, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote: > And it would be very useful if we would allow an easy way to setup > hundreds of "dumb briges", simple TCP forwarding proxy that goes in a > random order across all public relays. No need to go in a random order across all

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 188: Bridge Guards and other anti-enumeration defenses

2012-06-12 Thread Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
On 6/12/12 12:32 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote: >> Any attacker who can extend circuits through a bridge can enumerate >> the set of guard nodes which it routes its clients' circuits through. >> A malicious middle relay can easily determine the set of entry guards >> used by a hidden service, and over

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 189: AUTHORIZE and AUTHORIZED cells

2012-06-12 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 01:45:43AM +0100, George Kadianakis wrote: > 3.1. AUTHORIZE cell > >The AUTHORIZE cell is a variable-sized cell. > >The generic AUTHORIZE cell format is: > > AuthMethod [1 octet] > MethodFields [...] >

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 188: Bridge Guards and other anti-enumeration defenses

2012-06-12 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 06:00:20PM +, Robert Ransom wrote: > On 2011-10-20, Nick Mathewson wrote: > > > 4.3. Separate bridge-guards and client-guards > > > >In the design above, I specify that bridges should use the same > >guard nodes for extending client circuits as they use for the