On 2012-02-29, Arturo Filastò wrote:
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 5:38 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
>
>> On 2012-02-29, Arturo Filastò wrote:
>>
>>> When Tor is configured to use both a Pluggable Transport proxy and SOCKS
>>> proxy it should delegate the proxying to the pluggable transport proxy.
>>>
>>>
On Feb 28, 2012, at 5:38 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On 2012-02-29, Arturo Filastò wrote:
>
>> When Tor is configured to use both a Pluggable Transport proxy and SOCKS
>> proxy it should delegate the proxying to the pluggable transport proxy.
>>
>> This can be achieved by setting the environm
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 20:04, Brandon Wiley wrote:
> However, you have a false assumption, that dictionary
> systems can simultaneously have all three properties of Zooko's Triangle.
This isn't an "assumption", but rather an actual claim about the
properties of the specific system I proposed (wi
On 2012-02-29, Arturo Filastò wrote:
> When Tor is configured to use both a Pluggable Transport proxy and SOCKS
> proxy it should delegate the proxying to the pluggable transport proxy.
>
> This can be achieved by setting the environment variables for the SOCKS
> proxy to that specified i
Hi Sai,
It looks like you've put a lot of thought into what would make a good
hash-to-word system. However, you have a false assumption, that dictionary
systems can simultaneously have all three properties of Zooko's Triangle.
This is a popular idea, but unfortunately untrue.
Hashes are effective
Following up on the discussion at the Tor dev meeting with Nick this
is the proposal for the Pluggable Transport through SOCKS proxies.
You can also find it committed on github:
https://github.com/hellais/torspec/commit/f0a89c8ded1971199fec6ffd0fe7e40562274ced
Filename: xxx-pluggable-transports-t
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 18:13, Ahmed Hassan wrote:
> You mentioned some good points about such as "Have a fixed number of template
> sentences", but you almost didn't mention how to implement your proposal.
We didn't elaborate at length because we thought the implementation
details of that weren
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 17:53, Robert Ransom wrote:
> I'm not going to follow that link.
… yet you're going to comment anyway, based merely on your imagination
of what it contains? O.o
> (Tor specification-change
> proposals are sent to the tor-dev mailing list in their entirety and
> copied in
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:27 -0500, Sai wrote:
> We've written up our proposal
Hmm, I wrote one last week. I described its mathematical implementation.
I got some replies that say it's cool idea, and some other troll.
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2012-February/023376.html
W
On 2012-02-28, Sai wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> We've written up our proposal for mnemonic .onion URLs.
>
> See
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/sT5CulCVl0X5JeOv4W_wC_A/edit?disco=AERhFsE
> for details; please read the full intro for explanations and caveats,
> as some are important.
I'm not g
Hello all.
We've written up our proposal for mnemonic .onion URLs.
See
https://docs.google.com/document/d/sT5CulCVl0X5JeOv4W_wC_A/edit?disco=AERhFsE
for details; please read the full intro for explanations and caveats,
as some are important.
tl;dr: It's a system that would have all three pr
Hi,
The provider where maatuska, my directory authority, has been hosted for
the last two years or so has had some trouble with its switches lately.
I was unable to keep maatuska on the network enough to be a good
participant of making a consensus. I decided to move the machine to a
place where I
12 matches
Mail list logo
