On 2012-01-17, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:43:00PM +0200, George Kadianakis wrote:
>> [0]: Did the Telex people clean up the patch, generalize it, and post
>> it in openssl-dev? Having configurable {Server,Client}Hello.Random in
>> a future version of OpenSSL would be neat.
>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:43:00PM +0200, George Kadianakis wrote:
> [0]: Did the Telex people clean up the patch, generalize it, and post
> it in openssl-dev? Having configurable {Server,Client}Hello.Random in
> a future version of OpenSSL would be neat.
At USENIX Security, Adam opined that opens
Nick Mathewson writes:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 9:12 PM, George Kadianakis wrote:
>
>> 3.2. AUTHORIZE cell format
>>
>> In shared-secret-based authorization, the MethodFields field of the
>> AUTHORIZE cell becomes:
>>
>> 'shared_secret' [10 octets]
>>
>> where:
>>
>>
On 2012-01-17, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 9:12 PM, George Kadianakis
> wrote:
>
>> 3.2. AUTHORIZE cell format
>>
>> In shared-secret-based authorization, the MethodFields field of the
>> AUTHORIZE cell becomes:
>>
>> 'shared_secret' [10 octets]
>>
>>
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 9:12 PM, George Kadianakis wrote:
> 3.2. AUTHORIZE cell format
>
> In shared-secret-based authorization, the MethodFields field of the
> AUTHORIZE cell becomes:
>
> 'shared_secret' [10 octets]
>
> where:
>
> 'shared_secret', is the shared secret
On 1/17/12 5:41 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>>>
>>> ORPort 1337 no-advertise alladdrs
>>> ORPort tornode.example.com:443 no-bind alladdrs
>>
>> This drives home the issue with alladdrs: what would we do if that flag
>> isn't listed here?
This feature would allow a single node, for example,
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> [Quoting the original mail, but it's actually the file in git that I
> read and am commenting on.]
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 02:13:18PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>> The 'AllAddrs' option tells Tor that if no address is given in the
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in a network where the Directory Authority hard-coded in Tor code are
> filtered a Tor client cannot bootstrap.
>
> But as far as i understood there are (hundreds?) of Tor DA Mirror.
>
> If so, packaging the Tor clients
Hi all,
in a network where the Directory Authority hard-coded in Tor code are
filtered a Tor client cannot bootstrap.
But as far as i understood there are (hundreds?) of Tor DA Mirror.
If so, packaging the Tor clients periodically, bundling the latest
consensus with the software, would provide h
