On 01/15/2012 07:30 PM, Steven Murdoch wrote:
> Although post suggests that the Android NKD may have the relevant
> options on by default:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7216543/does-android-ndk-build-with-gc-sections-and-how-to-disable
We are still actually building with our pre-NDK "droid
On 01/15/2012 03:47 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Some stuff to try: openssl has lots of optional features and ciphers;
> you could probably disable a lot of them. There are configuration
> options to do so. If you're not sure what, I could try to take a look
> at the list some time this week.
Th
On 01/16/2012 01:11 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> clang does something similar with -O4 (link time optimization). See
> http://llvm.org/docs/LinkTimeOptimization.html near "In this
> example, the linker recognizes that foo2() " for more details
Will check it out. Thx!
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've noticed the "Simulator for slow Internet connections " project on
> the volunteer page and I have relevant experience. Who can I contact
> to lend a hand?
You might want to see whether what the ExperimentTor[1] and Shadow[2]
proj
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 02:41:11PM -0600, Watson Ladd wrote:
> > As far as I know, only the journal reviewers and this list (and we
> > authors, of course) have looked at it. Not too surprising, of course,
> > as Tor is probably the most obvious use case.
> Most SSL connections involve only one au
On Jan 16, 2012 2:38 PM, "Ian Goldberg" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:16:31PM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Ian Goldberg
wrote:
> > [...]
> > > FYI: it's now been accepted to the Designs, Codes, and Cryptography
> > > jounral:
> > >
> > > http://www.spr
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:16:31PM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> [...]
> > FYI: it's now been accepted to the Designs, Codes, and Cryptography
> > jounral:
> >
> > http://www.springerlink.com/content/nl86n0u547873001/
> >
> > (The above cacr
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Ian Goldberg wrote:
[...]
> FYI: it's now been accepted to the Designs, Codes, and Cryptography
> jounral:
>
> http://www.springerlink.com/content/nl86n0u547873001/
>
> (The above cacr link has also been updated to the latest version.)
Congratulations, Ian! Any s
On 1/16/12 8:46 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 1/11/12 10:34 AM, Linus Nordberg wrote:
>> Alex Le Heux wrote
>> Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:57:00 +0100:
>>
>> | > RFC 3849 defines the prefix 2001:DB8::/32 as being reserved for
>> | > documentation. That should be fine for this.
>> |
>> | The documentat
Maybe this question is more appropriate for tor-dev mailing list?
How to submit a certain IP:Port to BridgeDB without using Tor?
-naif
Original Message
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Bridge: Why not just stateless TCP socket proxy
/ forwarders?
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:29:41 +0100
Fr
10 matches
Mail list logo
